首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Investor protection and income inequality: Risk sharing vs risk taking
【24h】

Investor protection and income inequality: Risk sharing vs risk taking

机译:投资者保护与收入不平等:风险分担与风险承担

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper studies the relationship between investor protection and income inequality. In the presence of market frictions, better protection makes investors more willing to take on entrepreneurial risk when lending to firms, thereby improving the degree of risk sharing between financiers and entrepreneurs. On the other hand, by increasing risk sharing, investor protection also induces more risk taking. By increasing entrepreneurial risk taking, it raises income dispersion. By reducing the risk facedby entrepreneurs, it reduces income volatility. As a result, the relationship between investor protection and income inequality is non monotonic, since the risk-taking effect dominates at low levels of investor protection, while risk sharing becomes stronger when more risk is taken. Empirical evidence from up to sixty-seven countries spanning the period 1976-2004 supports the predictions of the model.
机译:本文研究了投资者保护与收入不平等之间的关系。在存在市场摩擦的情况下,更好的保护使投资者在向企业贷款时更愿意承担创业风险,从而提高了金融家和企业家之间的风险分担程度。另一方面,通过增加风险分担,投资者保护也引起更多的冒险。通过增加创业风险承担,它增加了收入分散。通过减少企业家面临的风险,它减少了收入的波动。结果,投资者保护与收入不平等之间的关系不是单调的,因为在投资者保护水平较低的情况下,风险承担作用占支配地位,而承担更多风险时,风险分担就会增强。 1976年至2004年期间,多达67个国家的经验证据支持了该模型的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号