...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand =: Chotmaihet thangphaet >Efficacy of portable vacuum dressing in chronic wound care: a prospective randomized control trial.
【24h】

Efficacy of portable vacuum dressing in chronic wound care: a prospective randomized control trial.

机译:便携式真空敷料在慢性伤口护理中的功效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Chronic wound is a common clinical condition and often cause treatment problems. This is because chronic wound usually require extended treatment period, which result in high hospital cost. The treatment of chronic wound depends on the type of wound, the cause of wound, and the physical status of patient. Vacuum dressing has become a standard treatment of chronic wound. However in most hospitals, vacuum dressing is only used for in-patients thus, keeping the patients in hospital for this treatment. The problems with this are the long hospital stay, the high cost, and the unavailability of bed for other patients. This problem led us to develop a new treatment to help chronic wound patient. The potential solution was the use of a portable vacuum machine for out-patient. If the efficacy of the portable vacuum machine was comparable to the wall vacuum then the benefit could be transferred to out-patient. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A Randomized control trial of two groups of patients, conventional vacuum dressing (n = 15) and portable vacuum dressing (n = 15), was done. Rate of wound healing was measured every three days and compared to represent efficacy between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: Thirty chronic wound patients were assigned randomly to a group of 15 for treatment with conventional wall vacuum dressing and another group of 15 for treatment with our portable vacuum dressing. Demographic data was similar in both groups (sex, age and underlying cause). Wound area was recorded at the start of the treatment on day 0 and recorded at day 3, 6, 9 and 12. It was then calculated into percentage of wound healing. Rate of wound healing was 1.57%/day in conventional group and 1.59%/day in portable group. There is no clinical difference between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our portable vacuum dressing method had no clinical difference from conventional wall vacuum dressing with respect to the rate of wound healing.
机译:背景:慢性伤口是一种常见的临床疾病,通常会引起治疗问题。这是因为慢性伤口通常需要延长治疗时间,这导致高昂的医院费用。慢性伤口的治疗取决于伤口的类型,伤口的原因和患者的身体状况。真空敷料已经成为慢性伤口的标准治疗方法。但是,在大多数医院中,真空敷料仅用于住院患者,因此将患者留在医院进行此治疗。这样做的问题是住院时间长,费用高以及其他患者无法使用床铺。这个问题导致我们开发出一种新的疗法来帮助慢性伤口患者。潜在的解决方案是将便携式真空机用于门诊。如果便携式真空吸尘器的功效与壁式真空吸尘器相当,则可以将收益转移给门诊病人。材料和方法:进行了两组患者的随机对照试验,即常规真空敷料(n = 15)和便携式真空敷料(n = 15)。每三天测量一次伤口愈合的速率,并比较两组患者的疗效。结果:30例慢性伤口患者被随机分为15组,以常规壁式真空敷料治疗,另一组15人,以我们的便携式真空敷料治疗。两组的人口统计学数据相似(性别,年龄和根本原因)。在治疗开始的第0天记录伤口面积,并在第3、6、9和12天记录伤口面积。然后将其计算为伤口愈合的百分比。常规组伤口愈合率为1.57%/天,便携式组为1.59%/天。两组之间无临床差异(p> 0.05)。结论:我们的便携式真空敷料方法在伤口愈合率方面与常规壁式真空敷料没有临床差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号