首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: meta-analyses by recruitment channel and methodological quality.
【24h】

Proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: meta-analyses by recruitment channel and methodological quality.

机译:主动戒烟的电话咨询:通过招募渠道和方法学质量进行荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews demonstrated that proactive telephone counseling increases smoking cessation rates. However, these reviews did not differentiate studies by recruitment channel, did not adequately assess methodological quality, and combined different measures of abstinence. METHODS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials published before December 31, 2008, included seven of active recruitment, 16 of passive recruitment, and one of mixed recruitment. We rated methodological quality on selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, withdrawals, and dropouts, according to the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. We conducted random effects meta-analysis to pool the results according to abstinence type and follow-up time for studies overall and segregated by recruitment channel, and methodological quality. The level of statistical heterogeneity was quantified by I(2). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Methodological quality ratings indicated two strong, 10 moderate, and 12 weak studies. Overall, compared with self-help materials or no intervention control groups, proactive telephone counseling had a statistically significantly greater effect on point prevalence abstinence (nonsmoking at follow-up or abstinent for at least 24 hours, 7 days before follow-up) at 6-9 months (relative risk [RR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.43, P < .001, I(2) = 21.4%) but not at 12-15 months after recruitment. This pattern also emerged when studies were segregated by recruitment channel (active, passive) or methodological quality (strong/moderate, weak). Overall, the positive effect on prolonged/continuous abstinence (abstinent for 3 months or longer before follow-up) was also statistically significantly greater at 6-9 months (RR = 1.58, CI = 1.26 to 1.98, P < .001, I(2) = 49.1%) and 12-18 months after recruitment (RR = 1.40, CI = 1.23 to 1.60, P < .001, I(2) = 18.5%). CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of point prevalence abstinence in the long term, these data support previous results showing that proactive telephone counseling has a positive impact on smoking cessation. Proactive telephone counseling increased prolonged/continuous abstinence long term for both actively and passively recruited smokers.
机译:背景:系统评价表明,主动电话咨询会提高戒烟率。但是,这些评论并未按招募渠道对研究进行区分,未充分评估方法学质量,并且将不同的禁欲措施组合在一起。方法:2008年12月31日之前发布的二十四项随机对照试验包括主动招募的7项,被动招募的16项和混合招募的1项。我们根据量化研究质量评估工具,对选择偏倚,研究设计,混杂因素,致盲,数据收集方法,退出和退出的方法学质量进行了评级。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以根据节制类型和随访时间汇总研究结果,以总体研究,按招募渠道和方法学质量分类。统计异质性水平由I(2)量化。所有统计检验都是双面的。结果:方法学质量评级表明两项强项,10项中等和12项弱项研究。总体而言,与自助材料或无干预对照组相比,主动电话咨询对6岁以下儿童的点流行率戒断(随访时不吸烟或随访前7天至少24小时戒烟)的统计学影响显着更大-9个月(相对风险[RR] = 1.26,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.11至1.43,P <.001,I(2)= 21.4%),但不是在募集后的12-15个月。当按招聘渠道(主动,被动)或方法论质量(强/中,弱)对研究进行分类时,也会出现这种模式。总体而言,对长期/持续禁欲(在随访前禁欲3个月或更长时间)的积极影响在6-9个月时也有统计学显着性提高(RR = 1.58,CI = 1.26至1.98,P <.001,I( 2)= 49.1%)和招募后12-18个月(RR = 1.40,CI = 1.23至1.60,P <.001,I(2)= 18.5%)。结论:除了长期的点流​​行戒断外,这些数据支持以前的结果,表明主动的电话咨询对戒烟有积极的影响。主动电话咨询可以增加主动和被动吸烟者的长期/持续禁欲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号