...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society >Comparison of four accelerated stability methods for lard and tallow with and without antioxidants
【24h】

Comparison of four accelerated stability methods for lard and tallow with and without antioxidants

机译:含和不含抗氧化剂的四种猪油和牛脂加速稳定方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The oxidative stability of lard and tallow with and without antioxidants was evaluated by four accelerated stability methods, the active oxygen method (AOM), the oxygen bomb test, the Rancimat method, and the Schaal oven test. The results indicated that the oxidative stability of animal fats and the relative effectiveness of an antioxidant in the fats could have different mechanisms. When the protective index was used to demonstrate the relative effectiveness of the antioxidants, the results suggested that the Rancimat Method may be the least reliable method compared with AOM, oxygen bomb test, and Schaal oven test. More than one accelerated stability method is recommended for evaluating the effectiveness of an antioxidant or the oxidative stability of fats. [References: 11]
机译:用四种加速稳定方法,活性氧方法(AOM),氧弹试验,Rancimat方法和Schaal烤箱试验评估猪油和牛油在有无抗氧化剂的情况下的氧化稳定性。结果表明,动物脂肪的氧化稳定性和抗氧化剂在脂肪中的相对有效性可能具有不同的机理。当使用保护指数来证明抗氧化剂的相对有效性时,结果表明,与AOM,氧弹试验和Schaal烤箱试验相比,Rancimat方法可能是最不可靠的方法。建议使用一种以上的加速稳定性方法来评估抗氧化剂的有效性或脂肪的氧化稳定性。 [参考:11]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号