首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
【24h】

A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.

机译:两种分配方法对养老院患者安全调查表的响应率的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Survey research focusing on patient safety issues in the nursing home sector poses challenges owing to nursing staff turnover rates, and the adversarial and punitive nature of US nursing home regulation which may promote a negative culture of distrust. Using a patient safety questionnaire, we compared two methods of survey distribution on response rates, respondent sample characteristics, and resident safety ratings. We hypothesized that employees may provide overly positive perceptions when the surveys are distributed on-site as opposed to distribution to employees' homes, as has been reported by studies evaluating patient satisfaction in other settings. METHODS: In August 2003, 26 nursing homes indicated their distribution method preference (mail directly to staff members' homes vs. distributed at work) for a survey determining perceptions of resident safety. Facilities provided lists of currently employed nurses (n=721) and nursing assistants (n=1,233). The survey process included an initial mailing of the survey packet, a reminder postcard, a re-mail of the survey packet to non-respondents to the initial survey, and a final reminder postcard. Return envelopes were addressed to the research team. RESULTS: In nursing facilities where surveys were distributed at work, a greater proportion of respondents were identified as no longer currently employed. Response rates were similar regardless of distribution method, but with greater variability in the facility-specific response rate in surveys distributed at work. Regardless of staffing type, yield of the first mailing was lower and yield of the second mailing higher in homes with surveys distributed at work than those mailed directly to respondents' homes. While characteristics of nurses were similar regardless of wave, nursing assistant responders to second mailing were more likely to be black relative to responders to the first wave. CONCLUSION: Distributing surveys at the workplace may not result in a reduction of response rate, but may provide overly positive perceptions of patient safety issues. Mailing directly to homes may result in less facility-level variability in response rates. Multiple mailings may increase the diversity of the respondent pool.
机译:背景:针对护理院部门患者安全问题的调查研究由于护理人员的离职率以及美国护理院法规的对抗性和惩罚性而构成挑战,这可能会带来负面的不信任文化。使用患者安全调查表,我们比较了调查分布的两种方法,即答复率,受访者样本特征和居民安全等级。我们假设在现场分发调查问卷时,员工可能会提供过分积极的看法,而不是分发到员工的家中,正如评估其他环境中患者满意度的研究所报告的那样。方法:2003年8月,有26家疗养院表明了他们对分配方法的偏爱(直接邮寄到员工的住所,而不是在工作中分配),以进行调查,以了解居民的安全感。设施提供了当前雇用的护士(n = 721)和护理助理(n = 1,233)的列表。调查过程包括初始邮寄调查包,提醒明信片,将调查包重新邮寄给初次调查的非答复者以及最终提醒明信片。回邮信封已寄给研究小组。结果:在工作场所进行调查的护理机构中,有更大比例的受访者被确定为不再雇用。不管采用哪种分配方法,答复率都是相似的,但是在工作中分配的调查中,针对特定设施的答复率存在较大差异。无论人员类型如何,在工作中分发调查的家庭中,第一次寄出的邮件的收益较低,而第二次寄出的邮件的收益较高,这比直接邮寄给受访者的房屋要高。尽管护士的特征是相似的,但不论其第一波如何,与第二波邮件的响应者相比,第二波邮件的护理助理响应者更可能是黑人。结论:在工作场所进行的调查可能不会降低回应率,但可能会给患者带来对患者安全问题的过度肯定。直接邮寄到家庭可能会导致设施级别的响应率差异变小。多个邮件可能会增加响应者池的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号