...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: JCMA >Acute effects of dual-chamber pacing on the left ventricular systolic function and relaxation in patients with advanced AV block and sick sinus syndrome.
【24h】

Acute effects of dual-chamber pacing on the left ventricular systolic function and relaxation in patients with advanced AV block and sick sinus syndrome.

机译:晚期房室传导阻滞和病态窦房结综合征患者双腔起搏对左心室收缩功能和松弛的急性影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Abnormal activation of the ventricles via right ventricular apical pacing deteriorates cardiac function, which may explain the increased mortality of patients with congestive heart failure receiving permanent pacemakers. We hypothesized that pacing at alternative sites may cause less detrimental effects on the cardiac function. METHODS: Five symptomatic patients with either advanced AV block (n = 4) or sick sinus syndrome with normal left ventricular (LV) function (n = 1) were studied. During cardiac catheterization, LV pressure was recorded with a high-fidelity catheter-tipped transducer. Baseline rhythms were sinus rhythm or VVI pacing. Sequential VDD pacing with variable AV intervals was performed at the right ventricular apex (RVA), right ventricular septum (RVS), right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and coronary sinus (CS). LV systolic function was assessed by calculating dP/dt(max) and LV diastolic function was indexed by calculating the exponential isovolumic relaxation constant (Tau). Percentage changes (mean +/- SE) from baseline to pacing were measured. RESULTS: RVA pacing reduced dP/dt(max) (-0.8 +/- 8.4%) and prolonged Tau (7.0 +/- 5.6%); RVS pacing enhanced dP/dt(max) (20.7 +/- 15.3%) and shortened Tau (-10.4 +/- 9%); RVOT pacing reduced dP/dt(max) (-8.0 +/- 20.0%) and shortened Tau (-6.0 +/- 12.2%); CS pacing reduced dP/dt(max) (-11.7 +/- 13.0%) and prolonged Tau (10.5 +/- 11.9%). Our results demonstrated that different pacing sites have different effects on LV contractility and relaxation in patients with normal LV function. CONCLUSION: Since pacing at the RVS preferably increased LV dP/dt(max) and shortened Tau, it may be a better alternative than the RVA.
机译:背景:通过右心室心律起搏使心室异常激活会使心脏功能恶化,这可以解释接受永久性起搏器的充血性心力衰竭患者死亡率的增加。我们假设在其他部位起搏可能对心脏功能的损害较小。方法:研究了五例有症状的晚期房室传导阻滞(n = 4)或左室功能正常(n = 1)的病态窦房结综合征患者。在心脏导管插入过程中,用高保真导管尖端换能器记录左室压力。基线节律是窦性节律或VVI起搏。在右心室顶点(RVA),右心室间隔(RVS),右心室流出道(RVOT)和冠状窦(CS)处进行连续的VDD起搏,间隔间隔可变。通过计算dP / dt(max)评估左室收缩功能,并通过计算指数等容松弛常数(Tau)索引左室舒张功能。测量了从基线到起搏的百分比变化(平均值+/- SE)。结果:RVA起搏降低了dP / dt(max)(-0.8 +/- 8.4%),延长了Tau(7.0 +/- 5.6%); RVS起搏提高dP / dt(max)(20.7 +/- 15.3%)和缩短Tau(-10.4 +/- 9%); RVOT起搏可降低dP / dt(max)(-8.0 +/- 20.0%)和缩短Tau(-6.0 +/- 12.2%); CS起搏可降低dP / dt(max)(-11.7 +/- 13.0%)和延长Tau(10.5 +/- 11.9%)。我们的结果表明,不同起搏部位对具有正常左室功能的患者的左室收缩力和松弛度有不同的影响。结论:由于在RVS处进行起搏最好增加LV dP / dt(max)并缩短Tau,因此它可能是比RVA更好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号