首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nephrology >Evaluation of measured and calculated creatinine clearances as glomerular filtration markers in different stages of liver cirrhosis.
【24h】

Evaluation of measured and calculated creatinine clearances as glomerular filtration markers in different stages of liver cirrhosis.

机译:评估和计算的肌酐清除率作为肝硬化不同阶段中的肾小球滤过标志物。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Discrepant results have been published regarding the suitability of creatinine clearance (C(Cr)) as a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in cirrhotic patients with normal renal function. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this study we evaluated the accuracy and precision of measured and calculated C(Cr) as indexes of GFR by comparing their values to those of inulin clearance (C(In)) in 10 healthy subjects and 20 patients with either Child's class A or Child's class C liver cirrhosis. RESULTS: The accuracy and precision of GFR estimates obtained by measuring C(Cr) were good in all three study groups. The mean values of the C(Cr)/C(In) ratio were 1.05, 1.03 and 1.04, respectively, and the corresponding coefficients of variations were 2.9, 2.9 and 3.8%. A close correlation between C(Cr) and C(In) was also found in each study group (r = 0.98, 0.99 and 0.97, respectively, with p < 0.001 in each case). C(Cr) calculated from serum creatinine by means of the Cockcroft-Gault formula (predicted GFR) proved to be a suitable measure of GFR in normal subjects and patients with Child's class A cirrhosis: the predicted-to-true GFR ratios were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively, CV was 12% in both cases. Moreover, a significant correlation between predicted and true GFR was observed in both groups (r = 0.73, p < 0.02 and r = 0.69, p < 0.025, respectively). On the contrary, in Child's class C cirrhotics, calculated C(Cr) significantly overestimated GFR (predicted-to-true GFR ratio 1.23, CV 20%) and no significant correlation was found between predicted and true GFR (r = 0.58, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study shows that measured C(Cr) is a reliable index of GFR in cirrhotic patients, irrespective of the degree of liver dysfunction. Calculated C(Cr) is still an adequate marker of GFR in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis, whereas it overestimates GFR in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. A lower muscle mass, a reduced ability to convert creatine to creatinine, and the presence of ascites are most likely responsible for the overestimation of GFR by the Cockcroft-Gault formula in the latter patients.
机译:背景:关于肌酐清除率(C(Cr))作为肾功能正常的肝硬化患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)的量度,已发表了不同的结果。受试者与方法:在本研究中,我们通过比较10名健康受试者和20名儿童患儿的C(Cr)值与菊粉清除率(C(In))的值,比较了测量和计算的C(Cr)作为GFR指标的准确性和精密度。 A级或儿童C级肝硬化。结果:通过测量C(Cr)获得的GFR估计值的准确性和精密度在所有三个研究组中均良好。 C(Cr)/ C(In)之比的平均值分别为1.05、1.03和1.04,相应的变异系数为2.9、2.9和3.8%。在每个研究组中还发现C(Cr)和C(In)之间密切​​相关(r分别为0.98、0.99和0.97,每种情况下p <0.001)。通过Cockcroft-Gault公式(预测的GFR)从血清肌酐计算出的C(Cr)被证明是正常受试者和儿童A级肝硬化患者的GFR的合适量度:预测的真实GFR比为0.93,两种情况下的CV分别为0.94和12%。此外,在两组中都观察到了预测的GFR和真实的GFR之间的显着相关性(分别为r = 0.73,p <0.02和r = 0.69,p <0.025)。相反,在儿童C级肝硬化中,计算出的C(Cr)显着高估了GFR(预测的真实GFR比1.23,CV 20%),并且在预测的GFR和真实的GFR之间未发现显着相关性(r = 0.58,p> 0.05)。结论:总的来说,这项研究表明,无论肝功能障碍的程度如何,测定的C(Cr)是肝硬化患者GFR的可靠指标。计算得出的C(Cr)仍然是代偿性肝硬化患者GFR的适当指标,而它却高估了代偿性肝硬化患者的GFR。较低的肌肉质量,降低的将肌酸转化为肌酸酐的能力以及存在腹水,很可能是导致后者患者中的Cockcroft-Gault公式高估了GFR的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号