...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nephrology >Prevalence of heparin-induced antibody in African-American hemodialysis patients--comparison to non-dialysis patients.
【24h】

Prevalence of heparin-induced antibody in African-American hemodialysis patients--comparison to non-dialysis patients.

机译:非洲裔美国人血液透析患者中​​肝素诱导的抗体的发生率-与非透析患者相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIMS: Heparin-induced antibody formation and thrombocytopenia are well-established complications of heparin use and may be associated with thromboembolic events. Our study aimed to establish the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies (HIA), otherwise known as platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies, and their relationship to thrombocytopenia and thrombotic events in a group of predominantly African-American hemodialysis patients over 12 months. For comparison, the prevalence of HIA in thrombocytopenic patients with serum creatinine of less than 2.0 mg/dl tested for the antibody in the same period was evaluated. METHODS: 36 hemodialysis patients on thrice-weekly, in-center treatments receiving heparin on dialysis were selected to have blood drawn predialysis for PF4 heparin antibodies (HIA). Complete blood counts (CBC) were also checked that day and monthly for the next 3 months. Outpatient records were reviewed for thromboembolic events, including thrombosis of dialysis access lines, grafts and fistulas. The HIA results for the dialysis patients were compared with HIA performed at the same lab for non-dialysis thrombocytopenic patients during the same period. RESULTS: 17 out of 36 (47%) hemodialysis patients had detectable HIA. There were no differences in gender, ethnicity, disease states, or duration of hemodialysis. None of the patients had thrombocytopenia, and the incidence of thromboembolic events was statistically not different from patients without HIA. The non-CKD thrombocytopenic group had a lower incidence, 16/88 (18%) of positive HIA. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-induced antibodies are relatively common in patients receiving hemodialysis. However, their presence does not appear to be associated with clinical consequences. Therefore, testing for HIA should be done only if a clinical indication is present.
机译:目的:肝素诱导的抗体形成和血小板减少症是公认的肝素使用并发症,可能与血栓栓塞事件有关。我们的研究旨在确定12个月以非裔美国人为主的血液透析患者中​​的肝素诱导抗体(HIA)(也称为血小板因子4(PF4)抗体)的患病率及其与血小板减少和血栓形成事件的关系。为了进行比较,评估了同期检测到的血清肌酐低于2.0 mg / dl的血小板减少患者的HIA患病率。方法:选择36名每周接受三次透析的血液透析患者,接受透析治疗时接受肝素,对他们进行PF4肝素抗体(HIA)的血液透析前透析。还在接下来的3个月的当天和每月检查全血细胞计数(CBC)。门诊记录被审查血栓栓塞事件,包括透析通路,移植物和瘘管的血栓形成。将透析患者的HIA结果与同一时期非透析血小板减少症患者在同一实验室进行的HIA比较。结果:36名血液透析患者中​​有17名(47%)可检测到HIA。性别,种族,疾病状态或血液透析持续时间无差异。所有患者均未发生血小板减少症,与没有HIA的患者相比,血栓栓塞事件的发生率在统计学上无差异。非CKD血小板减少组的HIA阳性率较低,为16/88(18%)。结论:肝素诱导的抗体在接受血液透析的患者中相对常见。但是,它们的出现似乎与临床后果无关。因此,仅当存在临床指征时才应进行HIA测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号