...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Case-mix and quality indicators in chinese elder care homes: Are there differences between government-owned and private-sector facilities?
【24h】

Case-mix and quality indicators in chinese elder care homes: Are there differences between government-owned and private-sector facilities?

机译:中国养老院的病例组合和质量指标:政府拥有的和私营部门的设施之间是否存在差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To assess the association between ownership of Chinese elder care facilities and their performance quality and to compare the case-mix profile of residents and facility characteristics in government-owned and private-sector homes. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Census of elder care homes surveyed in Nanjing (2009) and Tianjin (2010). Participants Elder care facilities located in urban Nanjing (n = 140, 95% of all) and urban Tianjin (n = 157, 97% of all). Measurements A summary case-mix index based on activity of daily living (ADL) limitations and cognitive impairment was created to measure levels of care needs of residents in each facility. Structure, process, and outcome measures were selected to assess facility-level quality of care. A structural quality measure, understaffing relative to resident levels of care needs, which indicates potentially inadequate staffing given resident case-mix, was also developed. Results Government-owned homes had significantly higher occupancy rates, presumably reflecting popular demand for publicly subsidized beds, but served residents who, on average, have fewer ADL and cognitive functioning limitations than those in private-sector facilities. Across a range of structure, process, and outcome measures of quality, there is no clear evidence suggesting advantages or disadvantages of either ownership type, although when staffing-to-resident ratio is gauged relative to resident case-mix, private-sector facilities were more likely to be understaffed than government-owned facilities. Conclusion In Nanjing and Tianjin, private-sector homes were more likely to be understaffed, although their residents were sicker and frailer on average than those in government facilities. It is likely that the case-mix differences are the result of selective admission policies that favor healthier residents in government facilities than in private-sector homes.
机译:目的评估中国养老机构所有权与绩效质量之间的关联,并比较居民的案例组合概况和政府拥有和私营部门房屋的设施特征。设计横断面研究。在南京(2009年)和天津(2010年)进行的养老院设置普查。参与者位于南京市区(n = 140,占总数的95%)和天津市区(n = 157,占总数的97%)的养老机构。措施建立了基于日常生活活动(ADL)限制和认知障碍的病例混合指数汇总表,以衡量每个机构中居民的护理需求水平。选择了结构,过程和结果指标来评估设施级的护理质量。还制定了一项结构质量衡量标准,即相对于居民的护理需求水平而言人手不足,这表明考虑到居民的病例组合可能会导致人员不足。结果政府拥有的房屋的占用率显着提高,大概反映了对公共补贴床的普遍需求,但为平均比私人部门设施的ADL和认知功能限制更少的居民提供服务。在质量的结构,过程和结果度量的一系列范围内,没有明确的证据表明任何一种所有权类型的利弊,尽管在相对于居民案例组合衡量人员与居民比率时,私营部门的设施与政府拥有的设施相比,人员配备的可能性更大。结论在南京和天津,尽管私人房屋的平均患病率和体弱多于政府机构的房屋,但私人房屋的人流更可能不足。案例混合的差异可能是选择性入院政策的结果,这种政策有利于政府机构中的居民比私营机构中的居民更健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号