首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association >Intraoperative antinociception and postoperative analgesia following epidural anesthesia versus femoral and sciatic nerve blockade in dogs undergoing stifle joint surgery
【24h】

Intraoperative antinociception and postoperative analgesia following epidural anesthesia versus femoral and sciatic nerve blockade in dogs undergoing stifle joint surgery

机译:硬膜外麻醉狗的硬膜外麻醉与股骨和坐骨神经阻滞后的术中抗伤害感受和术后镇痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective—To compare analgesic efficacy of preoperative epidural anesthesia with efficacy of femoral and sciatic nerve blockade in dogs undergoing hind limb orthopedic surgery.Design—Prospective randomized blinded clinical study.Animals—22 dogs requiring stifle joint surgery.Procedures—Dogs were premedicated with acepromazine and morphine, and anesthesia was induced with diazepam and propofol and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen. Prior to surgery, a combination of 1.0% lidocaine solution with 0.25% bupivacaine solutionwas administered either into the lumbosacral epidural space (11 dogs) or perineurally along the femoral and sciatic nerves (11). Intraoperative nociception was assumed if heart rate or systolic blood pressure increased by > 10% from baseline, in which case fentanyl (2 jig/kg [0.9 jxg/lb], IV) was administered as rescue analgesia. Following recovery from anesthesia, signs of postoperative pain were assessed every 30 minutes for 360 minutes from the time of local anesthetic administration via the modified Glasgow pain scale. Patients with scores > 5 (scale, 0 to 20) received hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg [0.05 mg/lb], IV) as rescue analgesia and were then withdrawn from further pain scoring.Results—Treatment groups did not differ significantly in the number fentanyl boluses administered for intraoperative rescue analgesia. Time to administration of first postoperative rescue analgesia was comparable between groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between groups in baseline pain scores, nor were there significant differences at any other point during the postoperative period.Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks provided intraoperative antinociception and postoperative analgesia similar to epidural anesthesia in dogs undergoing stifle joint surgery.
机译:目的—比较术前硬膜外麻醉与股骨和坐骨神经阻滞术对后肢整形外科手术犬的镇痛效果。设计—前瞻性随机盲临床研究;动物—22例需要窒息关节手术的犬。程序—狗预先服用乙丙嗪。吗啡;吗啡;吗啡;吗啡;吗啡;吗啡;吗啡;吗啡;地西epa和丙泊酚诱导麻醉,七氟醚维持氧气。手术前,将1.0%利多卡因溶液和0.25%布比卡因溶液的组合给药于腰s硬膜外腔(11只狗)或沿股神经和坐骨神经沿神经周给药(11)。如果心率或收缩压比基线升高> 10%,则认为是术中的伤害感受,在这种情况下,使用芬太尼(2夹具/千克[0.9克/磅],静脉注射)进行镇痛。从麻醉中恢复后,通过改良的格拉斯哥疼痛量表从局部麻醉开始起每30分钟评估一次术后疼痛的症状,持续360分钟。得分> 5(等级,0至20)的患者接受氢吗啡酮(0.1 mg / kg [0.05 mg / lb],IV)作为抢救性镇痛,然后退出进一步的疼痛评分。结果—治疗组在两组之间无明显差异。芬太尼大剂量用于术中抢救镇痛。两组术后首次施行急救镇痛的时间相当。此外,两组之间的基线疼痛评分无显着差异,术后期间其他各点也无显着差异。结论和临床意义-股骨头和坐骨神经阻滞提供了与狗的硬膜外麻醉相似的术中抗伤害感受和术后镇痛进行窒息性关节手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号