首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: Which outcomes are most reliable?
【24h】

Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: Which outcomes are most reliable?

机译:对减肥手术质量进行剖析的医院:哪些结果最可靠?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Results Overall and serious complications had the highest overall reliability, but this was heavily dependent on caseload. For example, among hospitals with the lowest caseloads (mean 56 cases/year), reliability for overall complications was 0.49 and 6.0% of hospitals had outlying performance. For hospitals with the highest caseloads (mean 298 cases/year), reliability for overall complications was 0.79 and 30.3% of hospitals had outlying performance. Reoperation had adequate reliability for hospitals with caseloads higher than 120 cases/year. Mortality had unacceptably low reliability regardless of hospital caseloads.Conclusions Overall complications and serious complications have adequate reliability for distinguishing outlying performance with bariatric surgery, even for hospitals with low annual caseloads. Rare outcomes, such as reoperations, have inadequate reliability to inform peer-based comparisons for hospitals with low annual caseloads, and mortality has unacceptably low reliability for bariatric performance profiling.Background Under the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, hospitals will receive risk-adjusted outcomes feedback for peer comparisons and benchmarking. It remains uncertain whether bariatric outcomes have adequate reliability to identify outlying performance, especially for hospitals with low caseloads that will be included in the program. We explored the ability of risk-adjusted outcomes to identify outlying hospital performance with bariatric surgery for a range of hospital caseloads.Study Design We used the 2010 State Inpatient Databases for 12 states (N = 31,240 patients) to assess different outcomes (eg, complications, reoperation, and mortality) after bariatric stapling procedures. We first quantified outcomes reliability on a 0 (no reliability) to 1 (perfect reliability) scale. We then assessed whether risk- and reliability-adjusted outcomes could identify outlying performance among hospitals with different annual caseloads.
机译:结果总体和严重并发症的总体可靠性最高,但这在很大程度上取决于病例数。例如,在病例量最低的医院(平均56例/年)中,总体并发症的可靠性为0.49,只有6.0%的医院表现不佳。对于病例量最高的医院(平均298例/年),总体并发症的可靠性为0.79,只有30.3%的医院表现不佳。对于每年病例数超过120例的医院,再次手术具有足够的可靠性。不论医院的工作量如何,死亡率的可靠性都无法接受。结论总体并发症和严重并发症即使在每年工作量较低的医院中,也具有足够的可靠性来区分减肥手术的外在表现。诸如再手术等罕见结果在可靠性方面不足以为年度病例数少的医院提供基于同行的比较,而死亡率在减肥性能分析方面的可靠性低得令人无法接受。在代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进计划的背景下,医院将获得经过风险调整的结果反馈,可用于同行比较和基准测试。减肥结果是否具有足够的可靠性来确定其外围表现尚不确定,特别是对于计划中将包括的病例量少的医院而言。我们探索了风险调整后的结局在一系列医院病例中通过减肥手术确定偏远医院表现的能力。研究设计我们使用了12个州(N = 31,240例患者)的2010年州住院患者数据库来评估不同的结局(例如并发症) ,吻合术,再手术和死亡率)。我们首先以0(无信度)到1(完美信度)的尺度量化结果的信度。然后,我们评估了风险和可靠性调整后的结果是否可以确定不同年度病例量的医院的出色表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号