首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Success of carotid endarterectomy in veterans: high medical risk does not equate with high surgical risk.
【24h】

Success of carotid endarterectomy in veterans: high medical risk does not equate with high surgical risk.

机译:退伍军人成功进行颈动脉内膜切除术:高医疗风险并不等同于高手术风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in stroke prevention has been well documented. But "high-risk" patients have traditionally been excluded from these studies and may be offered alternate therapies. We examined the safety of CEA in veterans, a medically high-risk group with multiple comorbidities. STUDY DESIGN: The records of all patients having CEAs performed between 1995 and 1999 in the Connecticut Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital were reviewed. Survival and freedom from stroke were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The effects of risk factors on outcomes were analyzed with Cox regression. RESULTS: There were 128 CEAs performed in 120 patients, with a mean followup of 8.5 years. Most patients were symptomatic preoperatively and had a high incidence of hypertension (83%), coronary artery disease (64%), diabetes (37%), and pulmonary disease (22%). Incidences of perioperative (30-day) mortality (0.8%), stroke (1.6%), and myocardial infarction (0.8%) were low. Survival rates at 8.9 and 12 years were 50% and 13%, respectively, with 90% patient followup. Freedom from ipsilateral stroke was 90% at 12 years. Age (hazards ratio [HR] 1.1, p=0.004), hypertension (HR 2.6, p=0.04), and elevated creatinine (HR 3.7, p=0.001) were significant risk factors for mortality. Age (HR 0.8, p=0.07) and diastolic blood pressure (HR 1.2, p=0.06) were predictive of ipsilateral stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Despite poor health and symptomatic presentation, patients treated with CEA achieved excellent perioperative outcomes and were protected from stroke for the remainder of their lives. Multiple medical comorbidities should not be used as exclusion criteria for CEA.
机译:背景:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)在预防中风方面的安全性和有效性已得到充分证明。但是传统上将“高风险”患者排除在这些研究之外,并且可能会提供其他治疗方法。我们检查了退伍军人中CEA的安全性,退伍军人是一种具有多种合并症的医学高危人群。研究设计:回顾了1995年至1999年在康涅狄格州退伍军人事务(VA)医院进行的所有CEA患者的记录。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析确定生存和无卒中。使用Cox回归分析风险因素对结局的影响。结果:120例患者进行了128例CEA,平均随访8.5年。大多数患者在术前有症状,并且高血压(83%),冠状动脉疾病(64%),糖尿病(37%)和肺部疾病(22%)的发生率很高。围手术期(30天)死亡率(0.8%),中风(1.6%)和心肌梗塞(0.8%)的发生率较低。 8.9岁和12岁的生存率分别为50%和13%,患者随访90%。 12岁时无患侧中风的发生率为90%。年龄(危险比[HR] 1.1,p = 0.004),高血压(HR 2.6,p = 0.04)和肌酐升高(HR 3.7,p = 0.001)是造成死亡的重要危险因素。年龄(HR 0.8,p = 0.07)和舒张压(HR 1.2,p = 0.06)可预测患侧中风。结论:尽管健康状况和症状表现不佳,但接受CEA治疗的患者围手术期效果良好,并在余生中免受中风侵袭。不应将多种医学合并症用作CEA的排除标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号