首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Patients at Standard Surgical Risk: Results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST)
【2h】

Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Patients at Standard Surgical Risk: Results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST)

机译:标准手术风险患者颈动脉段与胚胎切除术的成本和成本效益:颈动脉血管内切除术的结果与腹膜术(嵴)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) demonstrated similar rates of the primary composite endpoint between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), although the risk of stroke was higher with CAS, and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) was higher with CEA. Given the large number of patients who are candidates for these procedures, an understanding of their relative cost and cost-effectiveness may have important implications for healthcare policy and treatment guidelines.
机译:背景颈动脉血运重建术与支架试验(CREST)的结果显示,尽管颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)之间的主要复合终点发生率相似,但CAS导致中风的风险较高,而心肌梗死(MI)的风险较高。 )与CEA相比更高。鉴于有大量患者可以参加这些手术,因此了解他们的相对费用和成本效益可能会对医疗保健政策和治疗指南产生重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号