...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Injury prevention priority score: a new method for trauma centers to prioritize injury prevention initiatives.
【24h】

Injury prevention priority score: a new method for trauma centers to prioritize injury prevention initiatives.

机译:伤害预防优先级评分:创伤中心优先考虑伤害预防措施的一种新方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Trauma centers are expected to develop injury prevention programs that address needs of the local population. A relatively simple, objective, and quantitative method is needed for prioritizing local injury prevention initiatives based on both injury frequency and severity. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric trauma patients (16 years or younger; n= 7,958) admitted to two Level I regional trauma centers (Johns Hopkins Children Center and Westchester Medical Center) from 1993 to 1999 were grouped by injury causal mechanism according to ICD-9 external cause codes. An Injury Prevention Priority Score (IPPS), balancing the influences of severity (based on the Injury Severity Score) and frequency, was calculated for each mechanism and mechanisms were ranked accordingly. RESULTS: IPPS-based rank lists differed across centers. The highest ranked mechanism of injury among children presenting to Johns Hopkins Children Center was "pedestrian struck by motor vehicle," and at Westchester Medical Center it was "motor vehicle crash." Different age groups also had specific injury prevention priorities, eg, "child abuse" was ranked second highest among infants at both centers. IPPS was found to be stable (r = 0.82 to 0.93, p < 0.05) across alternate measures of injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: IPPS is a relatively simple and objective tool that uses data available in trauma center registries to rank injury causes according to both frequency and severity. Differences between two centers and across age groups suggest IPPS may be useful in tailoring injury prevention programs to local population needs.
机译:背景:预计创伤中心将制定预防伤害计划,以解决当地居民的需求。需要一种相对简单,客观和定量的方法,以便根据伤害发生频率和严重性来确定局部伤害预防措施的优先级。研究设计:根据ICD-9外部分类,将1993年至1999年在两个I级地区创伤中心(约翰霍普金斯儿童中心和威彻斯特医学中心)入院的小儿创伤患者(16岁或更小; n = 7,958)进行了分类。原因代码。为每种机制计算了平衡严重性(基于伤害严重性评分)和频率的影响的伤害预防优先级评分(IPPS),并据此对机制进行了排名。结果:基于IPPS的排名列表在各个中心之间有所不同。向约翰·霍普金斯儿童中心求助的儿童中受伤程度最高的机制是“行人撞车”,而在威彻斯特医学中心,这是“机动车撞车”。不同年龄组也有特定的伤害预防重点,例如,“虐待儿童”在两个中心的婴儿中排名第二。在各种损伤严重程度的测量中,发现IPPS稳定(r = 0.82至0.93,p <0.05)。结论:IPPS是一个相对简单,客观的工具,它使用创伤中心登记处提供的数据根据​​频率和严重性对伤害原因进行排名。两个中心之间以及不同年龄组之间的差异表明,IPPS可能有助于根据当地居民的需求量身定制伤害预防计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号