首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Outcomes of discontinuing rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Analysis from the ROCKET AF trial (Rivaroxaban once-daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation)
【24h】

Outcomes of discontinuing rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Analysis from the ROCKET AF trial (Rivaroxaban once-daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation)

机译:非瓣膜性房颤患者停用利伐沙班与华法林相比的结果:ROCKET AF试验的分析(Rivaroxaban每日一次口服口服直接Xa抑制与维生素K拮抗作用相比较,以预防中风和房颤栓塞试验)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to understand the possible risk of discontinuation in the context of clinical care. Background: Rivaroxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Concerns exist regarding possible increased risk of stroke and non-central nervous system (CNS) thromboembolic events early after discontinuation of rivaroxaban. Methods: We undertook a post-hoc analysis of data from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation, n = 14,624) for stroke or non-CNS embolism within 30 days after temporary interruptions of 3 days or more, early permanent study drug discontinuation, and end-of-study transition to open-label therapy. Results: Stroke and non-CNS embolism occurred at similar rates after temporary interruptions (rivaroxaban: n = 9, warfarin: n = 8, 6.20 vs. 5.05/100 patient-years, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 3.31, p = 0.62) and after early permanent discontinuation (rivaroxaban: n = 42, warfarin: n = 36, 25.60 vs. 23.28/100 patient-years, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.72, p = 0.66). Patients transitioning to open-label therapy at the end of the study had more strokes with rivaroxaban (n = 22) versus warfarin (n = 6, 6.42 vs. 1.73/100 patient-years, HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.51 to 9.16, p = 0.0044) and took longer to reach a therapeutic international normalized ratio with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. All thrombotic events within 30 days of any study drug cessation (including stroke, non-CNS embolism, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) were similar between groups (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26, p = 0.85). Conclusions: In atrial fibrillation patients who temporarily or permanently discontinued anticoagulation, the risk of stroke or non-CNS embolism was similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. An increased risk of stroke and non-CNS embolism was observed in rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with warfarin-treated patients after the end of the study, underscoring the importance of therapeutic anticoagulation coverage during such a transition. ? 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是了解在临床护理中可能终止治疗的风险。背景:利伐沙班在预防房颤患者中风方面不逊于华法林。在利伐沙班停用后早期存在中风和非中枢神经系统(CNS)血栓栓塞事件可能增加的风险。方法:我们对ROCKET AF(瑞伐罗班每日一次,口服,直接因子Xa抑制与维生素K拮抗剂在房颤中预防卒中和栓塞的试验,n = 14,624)进行事后分析。暂时中断3天或更长时间,早期永久性研究药物停药以及研究结束后过渡到开放标签治疗后30天内发生非CNS栓塞。结果:中风和非中枢神经系统栓塞在暂时中断后发生率相似(利伐沙班:n = 9,华法林:n = 8,6.20 vs.5.05 / 100患者-年,危险比[HR]:1.28,95%置信区间[CI]:0.49至3.31,p = 0.62),并且在永久永久终止后(利伐沙班:n = 42,华法林:n = 36,25.60 vs. 23.28 / 100患者年,HR:1.10,95%CI:0.71至1.72,p = 0.66)。研究结束后转为开放标签治疗的患者中,利伐沙班组(n = 22)比华法林组(n = 6,6.42对1.73 / 100患者-年,HR:3.72,95%CI:1.51至9.16,p = 0.0044),并且利伐沙班和华法林达到国际标准化治疗所需的时间更长。组间任何研究药物停用后30天内的所有血栓事件(包括中风,非CNS栓塞,心肌梗塞和血管死亡)均相似(HR:1.02,95%CI:0.83至1.26,P = 0.85)。结论:在暂时或永久终止抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,利伐沙班或华法林与中风或非中枢神经系统栓塞的风险相似。在研究结束后,与华法林治疗的患者相比,利伐沙班治疗的患者中风和非中枢神经系统栓塞的风险增加,强调了在这种过渡期间治疗性抗凝治疗的重要性。 ? 2013美国心脏病学会基金会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号