...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >Metrics of meaningfulness as opposed to sleights of significance
【24h】

Metrics of meaningfulness as opposed to sleights of significance

机译:有意义的量度,而不是有意义的量度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For some 80 years, statistical analyses have been predicated on the testing of hypotheses and evaluated by the probabilities of outcomes. This reflects Karl Popper's principle of falsifiability that states: before something can be accepted, the opposite has to be shown to be untenable. By convention, two principal hypotheses are usually stated: a research hypothesis - i.e. "A influences B" - and a null hypothesis - i.e. "A has no influence on B". It is the latter that is tested. Only when the null hypothesis is shown to be untenable can the research hypothesis be accepted. Usually, a probability of 0.05 is used as a cut-off. Probabilities equal to or less than 0.05 are considered to be statistically significant, whereas those greater than 0.05 are not.
机译:大约80年以来,统计分析一直以假设检验为基础,并根据结果的概率进行评估。这反映了卡尔·波普(Karl Popper)的证伪性原则,该原则指出:在某些东西被接受之前,必须证明相反的观点是站不住脚的。按照惯例,通常陈述两个主要假设:研究假设-即“ A影响B”和无效假设-即“ A对B没有影响”。后者是经过测试的。只有当原假设被证明是站不住脚的时候,研究假设才能被接受。通常,将0.05的概率用作临界值。等于或小于0.05的概率被认为具有统计学意义,而大于0.05的概率则不具有统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号