...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association >Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
【24h】

Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

机译:机械血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性卒中的社会经济差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that socioeconomic disparities in access to treatment of cerebrovascular diseases exist. We studied the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to determine if disparities exist in utilization of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Using the NIS for the years 2006-2010, we selected all discharges with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. Patients who received mechanical thrombectomy for stroke were identified by using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure code 39.74. We examined the utilization rates of mechanical thrombectomy by race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander), income quartile (first, second to third, and fourth), and insurance status (Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, and private). We also studied thrombectomy utilization rates at hospitals that performed thrombectomy. Results: From 2006 to 2010, 2,087,017 patients were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke; 8946 patients (.4%) received mechanical thrombectomy. Compared with white patients, black patients had significantly lower rates of overall mechanical thrombectomy utilization (odds ratio [OR] = .59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .55-.64, P < .0001) and at centers that offered mechanical thrombectomy (OR = .44, 95% CI = .41-.47, P < 0001). Compared with patients in the highest income quartile, patients in the lowest income quartile had significantly lower rates of mechanical thrombectomy utilization both overall (OR = .66, 95% CI = .62-.70, P < .0001) and at centers that offered mechanical thrombectomy (OR = .80, 95% CI = .75-.84, P < .0001). Compared with patients with private insurance, self-pay patients had significantly lower mechanical thrombectomy utilization both overall (OR = .71, 95% CI =.64-.78, P < .0001) and at centers that offered mechanical thrombectomy (OR = .81, 95% CI .74-.90, P < .0001). Conclusions: Significant socioeconomic disparities exist in the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy in the United States.
机译:背景:先前的研究表明,在治疗脑血管疾病方面存在社会经济差异。我们研究了全国住院患者样本(NIS),以确定在机械性血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性卒中中是否存在差异。方法:使用2006-2010年的NIS,我们选择了所有可对急性缺血性中风进行初步诊断的分泌物。通过使用《国际疾病分类,第九次修订》,程序代码39.74来识别接受机械性中风血栓切除术的患者。我们按种族/族裔(白人,黑人,西班牙裔和亚裔/太平洋岛民),收入四分位数(第一,第二至第三和第四)和保险状况(医疗保险,医疗补助,自付费用)检查了机械血栓切除术的利用率和私有)。我们还研究了进行血栓切除术的医院的血栓切除术利用率。结果:从2006年到2010年,有2087017例患者被初步诊断为急性缺血性中风; 8946例患者(0.4%)接受了机械血栓切除术。与白人患者相比,黑人患者在整体机械血栓切除术中的利用率显着降低(优势比[OR] = .59,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.55-0.64,P <.0001)机械血栓切除术(OR = .44,95%CI = .41-.47,P <0001)。与收入最高的四分位数患者相比,收入最低的四分位数患者在总体上(OR = .66,95%CI = .62-.70,P <.0001)和机械血栓切除术利用率显着降低提供了机械血栓切除术(OR = .80,95%CI = .75-.84,P <.0001)。与有私人保险的患者相比,自费患者在整体(OR = .71,95%CI = .64-.78,P <.0001)和提供机械血栓切除术的中心(OR = 0.71,显着降低) .81,95%CI .74-.90,P <.0001)。结论:在美国,机械血栓切除术的使用存在着巨大的社会经济差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号