首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >PLAYER SELECTION BIAS IN NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE DRAFTEES
【24h】

PLAYER SELECTION BIAS IN NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE DRAFTEES

机译:全国足球联赛球员的球员选择偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Relative age effects (RAEs) have been studied as a potential factor associated with player selection bias in numerous sports. However, little research has examined the role of RAEs among National Football League (NFL) draftees. The purpose of the current study was to determine the existence of RAEs in NFL draftees from the last 10 NFL drafts. Draftee birth dates were collected and divided into calendar and scholastic quarters (SQ1-SQ4). To determine the presence of RAEs in specific subsets, NFL draftees were grouped according to round drafted, position, level of conference play, and age at the time of the draft. Significant chi(2) tests (p <= 0.05) comparing observed birth-date distributions vs. the expected birth-date distribution from the general population were followed up by calculating the standardized residual for each quarter (z. > +/-.0 indicating significance). Overall, no RAEs were seen when birth-date distribution was assessed using calendar quarters (p = 0.47), but more draftees were born in SQ2 (December-February) than expected (p, 0.01; z = + 2.2). Significantly more draftees were born in SQ2 than expected for middle-round draftees (p = 0.01; z = + 2.4), skill positions (p = 0.03; z = + 2.3), Power Five college draftees (p, 0.01; z = + 2.6), and early draftees (p, 0.01; z = + 3.1). However, reverse RAEs were seen among late draftees, with fewer draftees being born in SQ2 (z = 23.6) and more being born in SQ4 (June-August; z = + 2.6) than expected. In contrast to previous research, the current study observed significant RAEs in NFL draftees from the last 10 years. This player selection bias should be considered when evaluating long-term athlete development models in American football.
机译:相对年龄效应(RAE)已被研究为与众多运动项目中运动员选择偏见相关的潜在因素。但是,很少有研究检查RAE在国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)选拔人员中的作用。本研究的目的是从NFL的最后10份草案中确定NFL的受训者中是否存在RAE。收集被告人的出生日期,并将其划分为日历季度和学术季度(SQ1-SQ4)。为了确定特定子集中的RAE的存在,NFL的受款人根据草稿时的回合起草,位置,会议进行的级别和年龄进行了分组。通过计算每个季度的标准化残差,对比较观察到的出生日期分布与普通人群的预期出生日期分布进行的显着的chi(2)检验(p <= 0.05),然后进行计算,计算出每个季度的标准化残差(z。> +/-。0)。表示重要性)​​。总体而言,当使用日历季度评估出生日期分布时,未见任何RAE(p = 0.47),但在SQ2(12月至2月)出生的征兵人数多于预期(p,0.01; z = + 2.2)。 SQ2出生的选拔人员明显多于中轮选拔人员(p = 0.01; z = + 2.4),技能职位(p = 0.03; z = + 2.3),强五级大学选拔人员(p,0.01; z = + 2.6)和早期起草者(p,0.01; z = + 3.1)。但是,在较晚的起草者中看到了反向RAE,在SQ2中出生的被选人较少(z = 23.6),在SQ4中出生的被征用人更多(六月至八月; z = + 2.6)。与以前的研究相比,当前的研究观察到近十年来NFL被征兵中有大量RAE。在评估美式足球的长期运动员发展模型时,应考虑这种球员选择偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号