...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >MONITORING THE INTENDED AND PERCEIVED TRAINING LOAD OF A PROFESSIONAL FUTSAL TEAM OVER 45 WEEKS: A CASE STUDY
【24h】

MONITORING THE INTENDED AND PERCEIVED TRAINING LOAD OF A PROFESSIONAL FUTSAL TEAM OVER 45 WEEKS: A CASE STUDY

机译:在45周内监测专业五人制足球队的预期和预期的训练负荷:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Rabelo, FN, Pasquarelli, BN, Goncalves, B, Matzenbacher, F, Campos, FAD, Sampaio, J, and Nakamura, FY. Monitoring the intended and perceived training load of a professional futsal team over 45 weeks: a case study. J Strength Cond Res 30(1): 134-140, 2016The aims of this study were to compare the training load intended by a coach with the training load perceived by the players, over a 45-week professional futsal team season and to compare the variation of session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) across different periods of the season. Eighteen Brazilian professional futsal players participated in the study. The players' rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and coach's rating of intended exertion (RIE) were collected daily throughout the study. To compare the sRPE variation, the season was divided into 4 periods as follows: preseason (PRE-SEASON), first competitive period (COMP1), intercompetition period (INTER-COMP), and second competitive period (COMP2). Based on the cluster analyses, the training sessions were classified into 3 different intensity zones (low, moderate, and high). In all the season periods and intensity zones, the players' RPEs were lower than the coach's RIE. In the low-intensity zone, the INTER-COMP demonstrated higher sRPE values than did the other periods. In the moderate-intensity zones, the INTER-COMP and COMP2 were similar. Finally, for the high-zone intensity, the PRE-SEASON demonstrated higher values than did the other periods. We concluded that the coach overestimated the training load reported by the players in almost all intensity training zones and season periods. The RPE scale does not seem to be a suitable tool when used by the coach for intended training load. Therefore, technical staff should constantly review the training goals in each season period through daily training load control, always taking into consideration the possibilities and limitations of the RPE method.
机译:FN的Rabelo,FN的Pasquarelli,B的Goncalves,B,Matzenbacher的F,Campos,FAD,Sampaio,J和Nakamura的F。在45周内监控专业五人制足球队的预期和预期训练负荷:一个案例研究。 J Strength Cond Res 30(1):134-140,2016该研究的目的是在45周的职业五人制足球赛季中比较教练预期的训练负荷与运动员感知的训练负荷,并比较整个季节不同时段的运动量评分(sRPE)的变化。 18名巴西职业五人制足球运动员参加了这项研究。在整个研究过程中,每天都会收集球员的感知运动评分(RPE)和教练的预期运动评分(RIE)。为了比较sRPE的变化,将季节分为以下四个时期:季前赛(PRE-SEASON),第一竞争时期(COMP1),竞争间时期(INTER-COMP)和第二竞争时期(COMP2)。根据聚类分析,将训练课程分为3个不同的强度区域(低,中和高)。在所有赛季和强度区域中,球员的RPE均低于教练的RIE。在低强度区域,INTER-COMP的sRPE值高于其他时段。在中等强度区域,INTER-COMP和COMP2相似。最后,对于高区域强度,PRE-SEASON显示出比其他时期更高的值。我们得出的结论是,教练高估了球员在几乎所有强度训练区和赛季期间所报告的训练负荷。当教练将RPE量表用于预期的训练负荷时,它似乎不是合适的工具。因此,技术人员应通过日常训练负荷控制,在每个季节期间不断审查训练目标,并始终考虑RPE方法的可能性和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号