首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >An examination of preactivity and postactivity stretching practices of NCAA division i, NCAA division ii, and NCAA division iii track and field throws programs
【24h】

An examination of preactivity and postactivity stretching practices of NCAA division i, NCAA division ii, and NCAA division iii track and field throws programs

机译:审查NCAA分区i,NCAA分区ii和NCAA分区iii的田径运动项目的运动前和运动后伸展练习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study is to determine the pre- and postactivity stretching practices of Division I, II, and III track and field throws programs. A 33-item survey instrument was developed to collect data regarding the warm-up and flexibility practices at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I (n = 320), Division II (n = 175), and Division III (n = 275) universities. A total of 135 surveys were completed for a 17.5% return rate, and although the response rate was generally low, it did mirror the distribution percentages of the 3 divisions. Significant differences were found for the level of United States Track and Field (USATF) certification and the use of static stretching (SS) between throws (x2 = 6.333, p = 0.048). Significance was also found for the USATF certification level and athletic trainer (AT) assistance in performing SS (x2 = 13.598, p = 0.01). Significant differences were also found for the NCAA division levels and the use of soft tissue mobilization (x2 = 5.913, p = 0.026). Although research supports dynamic warm-up/stretching over other forms of preactivity protocols, it seems that some track-and-field throws coaches are reluctant to completely discontinue preactivity SS. The results of this study suggest that it is necessary for track and field throws coaches to reevaluate their own practices, perhaps better aligning them with current research findings.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定第一,第二和第三分部田径掷项目的运动前和运动后伸展练习。开发了一种33项调查工具,以收集有关美国大学体育协会(NCAA)第一分部(n = 320),第二分部(n = 175)和第三分部(n = 275)大学。总共完成了135次调查,返回率为17.5%,尽管答复率总体较低,但确实反映了3个部门的分配百分比。发现美国田径(USATF)认证水平和掷球之间使用静态拉伸(SS)的使用之间存在显着差异(x2 = 6.333,p = 0.048)。在执行SS的过程中,USATF认证水平和运动教练(AT)协助也具有重要意义(x2 = 13.598,p = 0.01)。在NCAA划分水平和使用软组织动员方面也发现了显着差异(x2 = 5.913,p = 0.026)。尽管研究支持动态热身/伸展运动,而不是其他形式的预先活动协议,但似乎某些田径投掷教练并不愿意完全中断预先活动SS。这项研究的结果表明,田径投掷教练有必要重新评估他们自己的做法,也许更好地使他们与当前的研究结果保持一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号