...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Efficacy of two different stretch training programs (passive vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) on shoulder and hip range of motion in older people
【24h】

Efficacy of two different stretch training programs (passive vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) on shoulder and hip range of motion in older people

机译:两种不同的拉伸训练计划(被动与本体感受神经肌肉促进)对老年人肩部和髋部运动范围的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

2012-The aim of this study was to determine the influence of 2 methods of stretch training (passive and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation [PNF]) on range of motion (ROM) in older people between the age of 60 and 70 years over a period of 13 weeks. Fifty-four participants (39 women and 15 men) were divided into 3 groups: passive (n = 17; 66.5 ± 6.5 years), PNF (n = 17; age, 64.7 ± 4.0 years old), and control (n = 17; age, 66.4 ± 4.5 years). The subjects trained 2 times per week on nonconsecutive days for 13 weeks. Each training session included 2 flexibility exercises focused on the shoulder and hip joints. The PNF group performed 6 seconds of passive stretching, 3 seconds of muscular contractions, and 2 seconds of relaxation. The passive group performed 10 seconds of stretching and 5 seconds of relaxation. This sequence was repeated 3 times by each group. The control group did not perform any stretching. In the PNF group, there was an increase in hip ROM (p< 0.001) between pretest and posttest in the passive group and an improvement (p< 0.001) was observed between pretest and posttest, whereas in the control group, there was a significant decrease (p< 0.01) in hip ROM between pretest and posttest. In shoulder ROM, there was an increase (p , 0.001) between pretest and posttest in the passive group and an improvement (p< 0.001) was observed between pretest and posttest in the PNF group. There were no changes in shoulder ROM between pretest and posttest in the control group. The analysis of variance showed significant differences in hip and shoulder ROM between passive and control groups and PNF and control groups, but no significant differences were found between passive and PNF. The main finding was that the ability of physically active older people to increase ROM in response to stretching techniques is similar for both passive and PNF techniques.
机译:2012年-这项研究的目的是确定两种拉伸训练方法(被动和本体感受神经肌肉促进[PNF])对60岁至70岁之间在一段时间内的老年人的运动范围(ROM)的影响13个星期。 54名参与者(39名女性和15名男性)分为3组:被动(n = 17; 66.5±6.5岁),PNF(n = 17;年龄,64.7±4.0岁)和对照组(n = 17) ;年龄为66.4±4.5岁)。受试者在非连续日每周训练2次,共13周。每个培训课程包括2个针对肩部和髋关节的柔韧性练习。 PNF组进行6秒钟的被动拉伸,3秒钟的肌肉收缩和2秒钟的放松。被动组进行10秒钟的拉伸和5秒钟的放松。每个组将该序列重复3次。对照组没有进行任何伸展运动。在PNF组中,被动组的前测和后测之间髋关节ROM升高(p <0.001),而在前测和后测之间髋关节ROM改善(p <0.001),而对照组中,显着提高。测试前和测试后髋关节ROM降低(p <0.01)。在肩部ROM中,被动组的前测和后测之间有增加(p,0.001),而PNF组的前测和后测之间有改善(p <0.001)。对照组的前测与后测之间,肩部ROM没有变化。方差分析显示被动组和对照组与PNF组和对照组之间的髋部和肩部ROM有显着差异,但被动组和PNF组之间没有发现显着差异。主要发现是,对于被动技术和PNF技术,身体活动的老年人响应拉伸技术而增加ROM的能力相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号