...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Comparisons of peak ground reaction force and rate of force development during variations of the power clean.
【24h】

Comparisons of peak ground reaction force and rate of force development during variations of the power clean.

机译:动力清洁变化期间峰值地面反作用力和力发展速度的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this investigation was to determine the differences in vertical ground reaction forces and rate of force development (RFD) during variations of the power clean. Elite rugby league players (n = 11; age 21 +/- 1.63 years; height 181.56 +/- 2.61 cm; body mass 93.65 +/- 6.84 kg) performed 1 set of 3 repetitions of the power clean, hang-power clean, midthigh power clean, or midthigh clean pull, using 60% of 1-repetition maximum power clean, in a randomized order, while standing on a force platform. Differences in peak vertical ground reaction forces (F(z)) and instantaneous RFD between lifts were analyzed via 1-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Statistical analysis revealed a significantly (p < 0.001) greater peak F(z) during the midthigh power clean (2,801.7 +/- 195.4 N) and the midthigh clean pull (2,880.2 +/- 236.2 N) compared to both the power clean (2,306.24 +/- 240.47 N) and the hang-power clean (2,442.9 +/- 293.2 N). The midthigh power clean (14,655.8 +/- 4,535.1 N.s(1)) and the midthigh clean pull (15,320.6 +/- 3,533.3 N.s(1)) also demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) greater instantaneous RFD when compared to both the power clean (8,839.7 +/- 2,940.4 N.s(1)) and the hang-power clean (9,768.9 +/- 4,012.4 N.s(1)). From the findings of this study, when training to maximize peak F(z) and RFD the midthigh power clean and midthigh clean pull appear to be the most advantageous variations of the power clean to perform.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定电源清洁变化期间垂直地面反作用力和力发展速率(RFD)的差异。精英橄榄球联盟的球员(n = 11;年龄21 +/- 1.63岁;身高181.56 +/- 2.61厘米;体重93.65 +/- 6.84公斤)进行了1组3次重复的强力清洁,悬挂式清洁,站在力量平台上时,以随机的顺序使用1次重复最大力量清洁的60%进行中大腿力量清洁或中大腿清洁。升降机之间的峰值垂直地面反作用力(F(z))和瞬时RFD的差异通过方差单向分析和Bonferroni post hoc分析进行了分析。统计分析表明,与大腿清洁(2,306.24)相比,大腿中部清洁(2,801.7 +/- 195.4 N)和大腿中部清洁拉力(2,880.2 +/- 236.2 N)的峰值F(z)显着更大(p <0.001)。 +/- 240.47 N)和悬挂电源清洁(2,442.9 +/- 293.2 N)。与大功率清洁( 8,839.7 +/- 2,940.4 Ns(1))和悬挂电源清洁(9,768.9 +/- 4,012.4 Ns(1))。从本研究的结果来看,当训练最大峰值F(z)和RFD时,中大腿力量清洁和中腿清洁拉力似乎是进行力量清洁的最有利方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号