...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery >Two ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction methods: the docking technique versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation--a biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading.
【24h】

Two ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction methods: the docking technique versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation--a biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading.

机译:两种尺侧副韧带重建方法:对接技术与可生物吸收的干扰螺钉固定-循环载荷的生物力学评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the effects of cyclic valgus loading on 2 techniques for reconstruction of the elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL): the docking procedure and the bioabsorbable interference screw procedure. A cyclic valgus load was applied to the 16 unembalmed elbows, and the valgus angle was measured at 1, 10, 100, and 1000 cycles. Testing was repeated after UCL palmaris tendon reconstruction via either the docking technique or bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. At cycle 1, the valgus angle was not different between treated and intact cases. At cycles 10 and 100, the valgus angle for the docking technique was significantly greater than that for both the intact cases and the interference screw technique. By the 1000th cycle, no difference was measured between the 2 techniques. In this study, bioabsorbable interference screw fixation resulted in less valgus angle widening in response to early cyclic valgus load as compared with the docking technique.
机译:我们比较了循环外翻加载对重建肘尺侧副韧带(UCL)的两种技术的影响:对接过程和生物可吸收干扰螺钉过程。将循环外翻负重施加到16个未压弯的肘部,并以1、10、100和1000个循环测量外翻角。通过对接技术或生物可吸收干涉螺钉固定重建UCL掌肌腱后,重复测试。在第1周期,治疗和完整病例的外翻角没有差异。在周期10和100,对接技术的外翻角明显大于完整病例和干涉螺钉技术的外翻角。到第1000个周期为止,这两种技术之间没有任何差异。在这项研究中,与对接技术相比,可生物吸收的干扰螺钉固定与早期的周期性外翻负重相比,可减少外翻角拓宽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号