首页> 外文期刊>Clinical medicine: journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London >Discrepancies between histology and serology for the diagnosis of coeliac disease (2).
【24h】

Discrepancies between histology and serology for the diagnosis of coeliac disease (2).

机译:乳糜泻的组织学和血清学差异(2)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editor - Discrepancies between histology and serology for the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) (Clin Med August 2009 pp 346-8) are inevitable, given the fact that, even measurement of transglutaminase autoan-tibodies (TGAA), the latter now considered to be the most efficient single test for CD,1'2 generated variable diagnostic accuracy in a workshop designated to compare test performance for TGAA among 20 institutions, comprising five commercial and 15 research and clinical laboratories. In that study six laboratories contributed sera from individuals with CD as defined by accepted clinical criteria including small bowel biopsy, and these were compared with healthy control sera from individuals not known to have CD or type 1 diabetes. Assays for TGAA included enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and radiobinding assays (RBA).
机译:编辑-诊断腹腔疾病(CD)的组织学和血清学之间的差异是不可避免的(Clin Med,2009年8月,第346-8页),因为事实上即使测量转谷氨酰胺酶自身抗体(TGAA),后者现在也被认为可以作为CD上最有效的单一测试,1'2在指定用来比较20个机构(包括5个商业实验室和15个研究与临床实验室)的TGAA测试性能的研讨会中产生了可变的诊断准确性。在该研究中,有6个实验室根据包括小肠活检在内的公认临床标准定义的CD患者血清,将这些血清与未知CD患者或1型糖尿病患者的健康对照血清进行了比较。 TGAA的测定包括酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和放射结合测定(RBA)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号