...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >End-of-life care and preferences for place of death among the oldest old: Results of a population-based survey using voices-short form
【24h】

End-of-life care and preferences for place of death among the oldest old: Results of a population-based survey using voices-short form

机译:寿命终了的护理和最年长的老年人对死亡地点的偏爱:使用语音简写的基于人口的调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: End-of-life care (EOLC) is a key component in care of older people. However, evidence suggests that the oldest old (>85 years) are less likely to access specialist EOLC. Objective: The study's objective was to explore experiences of EOLC among the oldest old and determine their reported preference for place of death. Design: The study involved a self-completion postbereavement survey. Methods: A census was taken of deaths registered between October 2009 and April 2010 in two health districts, identified from death certificates. Views of Informal Carers-Evalution of Service (VOICES)-Short Form was sent to each informant (n=1422, usually bereaved relative) 6 to 12 months after the death. Results: Of 473 (33%) who responded, 48% of decedents were age 85 or over. There were no age differences in reported care quality in the last three months, but in the last two days the oldest old were reported to receive poorer relief of nonpain symptoms and less emotional and spiritual support. Compared to people under age 85, the over 85s were less likely to be reported to know they were dying, to have a record of their preferences for place of death, to die in their preferred place, to have enough choice about place of death - and more likely to be reported to have had unwanted treatment decisions. Being over 85 years was associated with a reduction in the odds of home death (OR=0.36); failure to ascertain and record preference for place of death contributed to this. Conclusions: Age-associated disparity exists in care provided in the last two days and the realization of preferences.
机译:背景:临终护理(EOLC)是老年人护理的关键组成部分。但是,有证据表明,年龄最大(> 85岁)的人不太可能接受专家EOLC。目的:该研究的目的是探索年龄最大的老年人中的EOLC经验,并确定他们对死亡地点的偏好。设计:该研究涉及一项自我完成的事后调查。方法:从死亡证明中识别出2009年10月至2010年4月之间在两个卫生区登记的死亡情况。死亡后6至12个月,向每位线人发送了非正式护老者的观点-服务评估(VOICES)-简短表格(n = 1422,通常是亲人)。结果:在473位回应者(33%)中,有48%的死者年龄在85岁或以上。在过去的三个月中,所报告的护理质量没有年龄差异,但在最近的两天中,据报道,最老的老人在缓解疼痛方面的缓解较差,在情感和精神上的支持也较少。与85岁以下的人相比,据报道,年龄在85岁以上的人不太可能知道自己快死了,有他们对死亡地点的偏爱记录,在其首选的地方死亡,在死亡地点有足够的选择-并且更有可能被报告做出了不需要的治疗决定。超过85岁与减少家庭死亡几率相关(OR = 0.36);无法确定和记录对死亡地点的偏爱导致了这一点。结论:与年龄相关的差异存在于最近两天提供的护理和偏好的实现中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号