...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public mental health >Why does relative deprivation affect mental health? The role of justice, trust and social rank in psychological wellbeing and paranoid ideation
【24h】

Why does relative deprivation affect mental health? The role of justice, trust and social rank in psychological wellbeing and paranoid ideation

机译:为什么相对剥夺会影响心理健康?正义,信任和社会地位在心理健康和偏执观念中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - Relative deprivation is associated with poor mental health but the mechanisms responsible have rarely been studied. The purpose of this paper is to hypothesize that childhood perceived relative deprivation (PRD) would be linked to sub-syndromal psychotic symptoms and poor wellbeing via beliefs about justice, trust and social rank. Design/methodology/approach - In total, 683 undergraduate students were administered measures of childhood PRD, hallucination-proneness, paranoia and wellbeing and measures of trust, social rank and beliefs about justice. A subsample supplied childhood address data. Multiple mediation analysis was used to assess pathways from childhood experiences to outcomes. Findings - Childhood PRD was associated with all three outcomes. The relationship between PRD and paranoia was fully mediated by perceptions that the world is unjust for the self and low social rank. The same variables mediated the relationship between PRD and poor wellbeing. There were no significant mediators of the relationship between PRD and hallucination-proneness. Research limitations/implications -Although our outcome measures have been validated with student samples, it may not be representative. The study is cross-sectional with a retrospective measure of PRD, although similar results were found using childhood addresses to infer objective deprivation. Further studies are required using prospective measures and patient samples. Social implications - Social circumstances that promote feelings of low social worth and injustice may confer risk of poor psychological outcome. Ameliorating these circumstances may improve population mental health. Originality/value - Improvements in public mental health will require an understanding of the mechanisms linking adversity to poor outcomes. This paper explores some probable mechanisms which have hitherto been neglected.
机译:目的-相对剥夺与不良的心理健康有关,但很少研究引起这种后果的机制。本文的目的是假设,通过对正义,信任和社会地位的信念,童年感知的相对剥夺(PRD)将与亚综合症精神病症状和不良的幸福感相关。设计/方法/方法-总共对683名本科生进行了儿童PRD,幻觉倾向,偏执狂和幸福感的测量,以及信任,社会等级和正义信念的测量。子样本提供了童年地址数据。多种中介分析被用来评估从童年经历到结局的途径。调查结果-儿童PRD与所有三个结果相关。认为世界不适合自己和社会地位低下的观念,珠三角与妄想症之间的关系得到了充分的调节。相同的变量介导了珠三角与幸福感之间的关系。珠三角和幻觉倾向之间的关系没有显着的调节剂。研究的局限性/意义-尽管我们的成果指标已经通过学生样本验证,但可能并不具有代表性。该研究是对PRD进行回顾性研究的横断面,尽管使用儿童期地址来推断客观剥夺也发现了类似的结果。需要使用前瞻性措施和患者样本进行进一步研究。社会影响-导致低社会价值感和不公正感的社会环境可能会带来不良心理后果的风险。改善这些情况可以改善人群的心理健康。原创性/价值-改善公共心理健康将需要了解将逆境与不良后果联系起来的机制。本文探讨了迄今为止可能被忽略的一些可能的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号