...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of refractive surgery >Evaluation of four microkeratome models: quality and reproducibility of cut edge and cut surface as determined by scanning electron microscopy.
【24h】

Evaluation of four microkeratome models: quality and reproducibility of cut edge and cut surface as determined by scanning electron microscopy.

机译:评估四种微型角膜刀模型:通过扫描电子显微镜确定的切割边缘和切割表面的质量和重现性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the quality and reproducibility of cuts produced by four automatic microkeratomes: Amadeus, Hansatome, Summit-Krumeich-Barraquer (SKBM), and Supratome. For the adjustable models (Amadeus and SKBM), the effects of oscillation frequency and blade feed rate were determined. METHODS: Eight cuts (flap thickness 160 to 180 microm) were made with each microkeratome at each parameter setting and examined using a scanning electron microscope. Quality of the cut surface was scored for each flap according to four criteria, and results were averaged to give a maximum possible score of 64. Quality of the cut edges was scored from 1 (blurred indistinct edge) to 3 (sharp and clearly visible edge). RESULTS: The four microkeratomes performed similarly on overall quality of the cut surface (range: 78% to 88% of theoretical maximum). The Hansatome scored highest (88%), followed by SKBM (86%; 1.0 mm/s blade feed and 7000 rpm oscillation), Amadeus (84%; 2.5 mm/s, 8000 rpm), Supratome (84%; 16.6 mm/s, 12,500 rpm), Amadeus (81%; 3.0 mm/s and 13,000 rpm), and SKBM (78%; 1.5 mm/s, 14,000 rpm). Performance differences were clearer for cut edge quality. The Amadeus produced cuts of the highest quality in 62.5% of cases (at both settings), compared with only 12.5% of cases with the Hansatome, 25% of cases with the Supratome and SKMB (1.0 mm/s, 7000 rpm), and in no cases with the SKBM at 1.5 mm/s and 14,000 rpm. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, high frequency with low blade feed rate is desirable for reproducible sharp edges and cut area quality. However, at very high frequencies (e.g., 14,000 rpm with the SKBM) tissue is displaced, producing an uneven cut area. Oscillation/feed quotients of 2000 to 4000 (rpm/mm x s) are a good compromise. Sharp edges are believed to reduce the risk of comeal erosion, introduction of epithelial cells into the interfacial region, and scarring during wound healing.
机译:目的:比较四种自动微型角膜刀(Amadeus,Hansatome,Summit-Krumeich-Barraquer(SKBM)和Supratome)产生的切口的质量和可重复性。对于可调模型(Amadeus和SKBM),确定了振荡频率和刀片进给速率的影响。方法:在每个参数设置下,用每个微型角膜刀切成8个切口(瓣厚度160至180微米),并用扫描电子显微镜检查。根据四个标准对每个襟翼的切割表面质量进行评分,并对结果进行平均,以得到最大可能的64分。切割边缘的质量从1(模糊的模糊边缘)到3(清晰且清晰可见的边缘)评分)。结果:四个微型角膜刀在切割表面的整体质量上表现相似(范围:理论最大值的78%至88%)。 Hansatome得分最高(88%),其次是SKBM(86%; 1.0 mm / s刀片进给和7000 rpm振荡),Amadeus(84%; 2.5 mm / s,8000 rpm),Supratome(84%; 16.6 mm / s,12,500 rpm),Amadeus(81%; 3.0 mm / s和13,000 rpm)和SKBM(78%; 1.5 mm / s,14,000 rpm)。性能差异对于边缘质量而言更为明显。在两种设置下,Amadeus的切割质量最高(分别为62.5%),而Hansatome的切割仅为12.5%,Supratome和SKMB的切割为25%(1.0 mm / s,7000 rpm),并且在任何情况下,SKBM都不会以1.5 mm / s和14,000 rpm的速度运转。结论:总的来说,高频率和低刀片进给速率对于可再现的锋利边缘和切割区域质量是理想的。然而,在非常高的频率下(例如,在使用SKBM时为14,000rpm),组织被移位,从而产生不均匀的切割区域。振荡/进料商为2000至4000(rpm / mm x s)是一个很好的折衷方案。据信锋利的边缘可减少伤口愈合过程中的彗星侵蚀,上皮细胞引入界面区域以及疤痕形成的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号