...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF OUTCOME MEASURES OF WALKING TRAINING USING ELECTROMECHANICAL AND ROBOTIC DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE
【24h】

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF OUTCOME MEASURES OF WALKING TRAINING USING ELECTROMECHANICAL AND ROBOTIC DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH STROKE

机译:对卒中患者使用机电和机器人设备进行步行训练的结果的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify appropriate selection criteria of clinical scales for future trials, starting from those most commonly reported in the literature, according to their psychometric properties and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains.Data sources: A computerized literature research of articles was conducted in MEDLEVE, EMBASE, CINALH, Pub-Med, PsychlNFO and Scopus databases.Study selection: Clinical trials evaluating the effects of electromechanical and robot-assisted gait training trials in stroke survivors.Data extraction: Fifteen independent authors performed an extensive literature review.Data synthesis: A total of 45 scales was identified from 27 studies involving 966 subjects. The most commonly used outcome measures were: Functional Ambulation Category (18 studies), 10-Meter Walking Test (13 studies), Motricity Index (12 studies), 6-Minute Walking Test (11 studies), Riv-ermead Mobility Index (8 studies) and Berg Balance Scale (8 studies). According to the ICF domains 1 outcome measure was categorized into Body Function and Structure, 5 into Activity and none into Participation.Conclusion: The most commonly used scales evaluated the basic components of walking. Future studies should also include instrumental evaluation. Criteria for scale selection should be based on the ICF framework, psychometric properties and patient characteristics.
机译:目的:本系统综述的目的是根据文献的心理计量学特征和功能,残疾与健康国际分类(ICF)域,从文献中最常报告的标准中确定适合将来临床试验的临床量表选择标准。数据来源:在MEDLEVE,EMBASE,CINALH,Pub-Med,PsychlNFO和Scopus数据库中进行了计算机文献研究。研究选择:评估机电和机器人辅助步态训练对中风幸存者效果的临床试验。 :十五位独立作者进行了广泛的文献综述。数据综合:从涉及966个受试者的27项研究中共鉴定出45个量表。最常用的结局指标是:功能性步行分类(18个研究),10米步行测试(13个研究),运动指数(12个研究),6分钟步行测试(11个研究),Riv-ermead移动指数(8个)研究)和伯格平衡量表(8个研究)。根据ICF领域,将1个结果度量分为“身体功能和结构”,将5个度量分为“活动”和“没有参与”。结论:最常用的量表评估步行的基本组成部分。未来的研究还应包括仪器评估。选择量表的标准应基于ICF框架,心理特征和患者特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号