首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >WISC-IV and Clinical Validation of the Four- and Five-Factor Interpretative Approaches
【24h】

WISC-IV and Clinical Validation of the Four- and Five-Factor Interpretative Approaches

机译:WISC-IV和四因素和五因素解释性方法的临床验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the constructs measured by the WISC-IV and the consistency of measurement across large normative and clinical samples. Competing higher order four- and five-factor models were analyzed using the WISC-IV normative sample and clinical subjects. The four-factor solution is the model published with the test manual. In the five-factor model, the POI differentiated into a visual-spatial factor (consisting of Block Design and Picture Completion) and a fluid reasoning factor (consisting of Matrix Reasoning and Picture Concepts, with and Arithmetic). The five-factor solution included Inductive Reasoning (IR), consisting of Matrix Reasoning and Picture Concepts, as a narrow ability subsumed under the FRI (Gf). When all 15 WISC-IV subtests were considered, both four- and five-factor models were suitable and showed close model-data fit. Further, both models generally demonstrated full factorial invariance between clinical and nonclinical samples. Interpretation of the fifth factor is discussed.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定通过WISC-IV测得的构建体以及在大型规范和临床样品中测得的一致性。使用WISC-IV规范样本和临床受试者分析了竞争性较高的四因素和五因素模型。四因素解决方案是随测试手册一起发布的模型。在五因素模型中,POI分为视觉空间因素(由模块设计和图片完成组成)和流体推理因素(由矩阵推理和图片概念组成,并带有和算术)。五因素解决方案包括归纳推理(IR),它由矩阵推理和图片概念组成,属于FRI(Gf)下的一种狭义能力。当考虑全部15个WISC-IV子测试时,四因素和五因素模型均适用,并显示出紧密的模型数据拟合度。此外,两个模型通常证明临床和非临床样品之间的完全因式不变。讨论了第五个因素的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号