首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >WAIS-IV and WISC-IV Structural Validity: Alternate Methods, Alternate Results. Commentary on Weiss et al. (2013a) and Weiss et al. (2013b)
【24h】

WAIS-IV and WISC-IV Structural Validity: Alternate Methods, Alternate Results. Commentary on Weiss et al. (2013a) and Weiss et al. (2013b)

机译:WAIS-IV和WISC-IV结构有效性:替代方法,替代结果。对魏斯等人的评论。 (2013a)和Weiss等人。 (2013b)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Weiss, Keith, Zhu, and Chen (2013a) and Weiss, Keith, Zhu, and Chen (2013b), this issue, report examinations of the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), respectively; comparing Wechsler Hierarchical Model (W-HM) and Cattell-Horn-Carroll Hierarchical Model (CHC-HM), subtest cross-loadings, and factorial invariance between clinical and normative groups from the respective standardizations. Both studies suffer from a number of theoretical, methodological, and practical problems that significantly limit conclusions and recommendations for practitioner interpretations of these instruments. Additional analyses and research are required to better inform practitioners for WAIS-IV and WISC-IV use.
机译:Weiss,Keith,Zhu和Chen(2013a)和Weiss,Keith,Zhu和Chen(2013b),本期报告对Wechsler成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)和Wechsler Intelligence的因子结构进行了检查。儿童第四版量表(WISC-IV);比较了各自标准的Wechsler层次模型(W-HM)和Cattell-Horn-Carroll层次模型(CHC-HM),子测试交叉负荷以及临床组和规范组之间的因式不变性。两项研究都存在许多理论,方法和实践问题,这些问题严重限制了从业人员对这些工具的解释的结论和建议。需要进行额外的分析和研究,以更好地为从业人员提供WAIS-IV和WISC-IV的使用信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号