...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical immunology: The official journal of the Clinical Immunology Society >Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8+ cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reac
【24h】

Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8+ cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reac

机译:不同造血细胞移植类型后中枢记忆,效应器记忆和效应器TCD8 +细胞亚群再生的不同模式:可能会影响抗巨细胞病毒免疫应答的恢复以及其反应的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

TCD8+ cells may be divided into subsets with different phenotypes and functions: naive, central memory, effector memory and effector. Aiming to better understand the differences in early reconstitution of these TCD8+ cell subsets and their relationship with post-transplant anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune responses recovery, we prospectively analyzed the transfer and expansion of these subsets in different transplant types. We found that graft cells from donor's peripheral blood, either allogeneic or autologous, were enriched for central memory, effector memory and effector phenotypes compared to allogeneic bone marrow grafts, as assessed by surface markers phenotyping and granzyme B expression. However, post-transplant, these subsets expanded in autologous recipients only, reaching numbers much greater than in allo-recipients at days +29 and +96. At the same time, autologous recipients presented less CMV reactivation and more vigorous CMV-induced interferon-gamma and lymphoproliferative responses. The marked loss of allo-transferred memory TCD8+ cells was probably due to the fact that they were more activated and more prone to apoptosis than auto-transferred TCD8+ cells as assessed by CD69 and active caspase 3 expression. Thus, transfer of peripheral blood stem cells in the allogeneic but not autologous setting is associated with poor expansion of memory TCD8+ cells, probably delaying antiviral immune reconstitution. These data may have important implications for the design of better strategies to immunoprotect this population against infectious challenges since different transplant types have different potentials for memory TCD8+ cells transfer and expansion.
机译:TCD8 +细胞可分为具有不同表型和功能的子集:天然,中枢记忆,效应记忆和效应。为了更好地了解这些TCD8 +细胞亚群在早期重建中的差异以及它们与移植后抗巨细胞病毒(CMV)免疫应答恢复的关系,我们前瞻性地分析了这些亚群在不同移植类型中的转移和扩展。我们发现与同种异体骨髓移植相比,供体外周血的异体或自体移植细胞丰富了中央记忆,效应记忆和效应表型,这是通过表面标记表型和颗粒酶B表达评估的。但是,移植后,这些亚组仅在自体受体中扩增,在+29和+96天时达到的数量远大于异体受体。同时,自体接受者表现出较少的CMV活化,并表现出更强烈的CMV诱导的干扰素-γ和淋巴增生反应。同种转移记忆TCD8 +细胞的明显损失可能是由于这样的事实,即与通过CD69和活性胱天蛋白酶3表达评估的自转移TCD8 +细胞相比,它们更具活化性,并且更容易发生凋亡。因此,外周血干细胞在同种异体而不是自体环境中的转移与记忆TCD8 +细胞扩增不良有关,可能延迟了抗病毒免疫重建。这些数据可能对于设计更好的策略来免疫保护该种群免受感染挑战具有重要意义,因为不同的移植类型对于记忆TCD8 +细胞的转移和扩增具有不同的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号