...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services >Evaluation of Fall Risk Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Patient Fall Prevention A Comparative Study
【24h】

Evaluation of Fall Risk Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Patient Fall Prevention A Comparative Study

机译:预防精神病患者跌倒的跌倒风险评估工具的评估比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Hendrich II Fall Risk Model T (Hendrich II) is used to determine patient fall risks. However, the WilsonSims Fall Risk Assessment Tool (WSFRAT) is more specific to psychiatric patients. The current study tested the Hendrich II and WSFRAT simultaneously to determine which tool was the most predictive for patient falls in a psychiatric population. Fall risk assessments using the Hendrich II and WSFRAT tools were completed through discharge. Fall risk assessment scores, medications, and falls data were documented. Fifty patients who met eligibility criteria generated 319 observations; of the 50 patients, two (4%) experienced falls. Sensitivity was 100% for the Hendrich II and WSFRAT, with all patients properly categorized as high risk for falling. Both assessments had similar specifi city (Hendrich II = 67.8%; WSFRAT = 63.1%). Both tools have similar specifi city; thus, additional research is warranted.
机译:Hendrich II跌倒风险模型T(Hendrich II)用于确定患者的跌倒风险。但是,WilsonSims跌倒风险评估工具(WSFRAT)更针对精神病患者。当前的研究同时测试了Hendrich II和WSFRAT,以确定哪种工具最能预测精神病患者的摔倒情况。使用Hendrich II和WSFRAT工具进行的跌倒风险评估已通过出院完成。记录跌倒风险评估得分,药物和跌倒数据。符合资格标准的50名患者产生了319项观察结果;在这50名患者中,有2名(4%)跌倒了。 Hendrich II和WSFRAT的敏感性为100%,所有患者均被正确分类为高跌倒风险。两项评估的指定城市相似(Hendrich II = 67.8%; WSFRA = 63.1%)。两种工具的指定城市相似。因此,有必要进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号