首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pathology: Journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland >Pathogenetic and clinical implications of Bcl-6 and Bcl-2 gene configuration in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.
【24h】

Pathogenetic and clinical implications of Bcl-6 and Bcl-2 gene configuration in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

机译:Bcl-6和Bcl-2基因在结节弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤中的发病机制和临床意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bcl-6 (LAZ-3) and Bcl-2 gene rearrangements have been respectively reported in 20-35 per cent and 10-25 per cent of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). Although these genetic lesions have been associated with different clinical outcomes (i.e., more favourable in Bcl-6 rearranged cases and poorer in Bcl-2 rearranged cases), their prognostic significance is still controversial. In the present study, we have investigated by Southern blot analysis the Bcl-6 and Bcl-2 gene configuration in a series of 80 lymph nodes involved by well-characterized DLBCLs, histologically defined according to the REAL and the updated Kiel classifications. The molecular findings have been correlated with the clinical features at presentation and with response to therapy. The majority of cases (57/80 = 71.2 per cent) had a centroblastic morphology. Bcl-6 rearrangements were detected in 23/80 cases (28.8 per cent), and were similarly associated with centroblastic (18/57 = 31.6 per cent) or immunoblastic (3/11 = 27.3 per cent) histotypes. In contrast, Bcl-2 was found to be rearranged in only three cases of centroblastic lymphoma (3.8 per cent). No significant differences were found between Bcl-6 rearranged and germline cases, as far as the clinical features at presentation are concerned. Forty-one patients, in whom the lymph node biopsy was performed at diagnosis, could be evaluated for response to treatment and clinical outcome. Most of these cases (30/41 = 73.2 per cent) were nodal DLBCL, without extranodal site involvement. Analysis of the clinical outcome showed no statistically significant differences between Bcl-6 rearranged and Bcl-6 germline cases (actuarial overall survival 50 per cent vs. 48 per cent, event-free survival 45 per cent vs. 46 per cent, at 4 years). These findings confirm that Bcl-6 rearrangements are the most frequent genetic lesion in DLBCL. The incidence of Bcl-2 involvement in our series is significantly lower than the figures reported in other studies, mainly from North American countries, probablyreflecting heterogeneous patient selection and/or epidemiological variability. Finally, our results suggest that no relevant clinical differences are observed between Bcl-6 rearranged and Bcl-6 germline cases, when nodal DLBCLs are considered.
机译:在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)中,分别报道了Bcl-6(LAZ-3)和Bcl-2基因重排的20-35%和10-25%。尽管这些遗传性病变与不同的临床结局相关(即在Bcl-6重排病例中更有利,在Bcl-2重排病例中较差),但其预后意义仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们通过Southern印迹分析研究了一系列80个淋巴结中Bcl-6和Bcl-2基因的构型,这些淋巴结由特征明确的DLBCL参与,并根据REAL和更新的Kiel分类在组织学上进行了定义。分子发现与临床表现以及对治疗的反应有关。大多数病例(57/80 = 71.2%)具有中心粒形态。在23/80例中检测到Bcl-6重排(28.8%),并与中心粒细胞(18/57 = 31.6%)或免疫母细胞(3/11 = 27.3%)组织型相似。相比之下,仅三例中心胶质淋巴瘤(3.8%)发现Bcl-2重新排列。就表现的临床特征而言,在Bcl-6重排病例和种系病例之间没有发现显着差异。在诊断时进行了淋巴结活检的41例患者,可以评估对治疗和临床结果的反应。这些病例大多数(30/41 = 73.2%)是淋巴结DLBCL,无淋巴结外累及。临床结果分析显示,重新排列的Bcl-6和Bcl-6种系病例之间无统计学差异(4年时精算总生存率分别为50%和48%,无事件生存率分别为45%和46%)。 )。这些发现证实了Bcl-6重排是DLBCL中最常见的遗传病灶。 Bcl-2参与本系列研究的发生率明显低于其他研究报告的数据,主要来自北美国家,可能反映了患者选择的异质性和/或流行病学变异性。最后,我们的结果表明,当考虑结节DLBCL时,在Bcl-6重排和Bcl-6种系病例之间没有观察到相关的临床差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号