首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior >Assessing Written Evidence of Critical Thinking Using an Analytic Rubric
【24h】

Assessing Written Evidence of Critical Thinking Using an Analytic Rubric

机译:使用分析性原理评估批判性思维的书面证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Adding a critical thinking activity to a large-enrollment, introductory nutrition class resulted in a grading challenge. Instructors overwhelmed by the task and lacking a framework for grading were inconsistent in evaluating hundreds of submitted assignments. A clear depiction of expectations, as well as a standardized method for evaluating performance, were needed. A literature search of tools for systematically scoring written work was conducted, resulting in the design, testing, and implementation of an analytic scoring rubric. Response to the rubric was positive and supportive of the critical thinking component as a valuable addition to the course.
机译:在大量招生的基础营养课上增加批判性思维活动会带来分级挑战。任务不堪重负,缺乏评分框架的教师在评估数百份已提交的作业时不一致。需要清楚地描述期望,以及评估绩效的标准化方法。进行了文献搜索,以系统地评估书面作品的工具,从而得出了设计,测试和实施分析性评分标准的方法。对规则的回应是积极和支持批判性思维的组成部分,是课程的宝贵补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号