首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >The Use of Traits and Contextual Information in Free Personality Descriptions Across Ethnocultural Groups in South Africa
【24h】

The Use of Traits and Contextual Information in Free Personality Descriptions Across Ethnocultural Groups in South Africa

机译:在南非各族裔群体的自由人格描述中使用特征和上下文信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study investigates the differences between 3 ethnocultural groups in South Africa in the use of traits and contextual information for personality descriptions and the interaction of these differences with social distance from the target person and with personality domains. Semistructured interviews asking for self- and other-descriptions were conducted with 1,027 Blacks, 84 Coloureds and Indians, and 105 Whites, representing the country's 11 official languages. In Part 1 we found similarities in the total set of categories used most often for personality description across the 3 groups-traits, behaviors, preferences, and perceptions (over 86%), which were context-free (over 66%)-as well as substantial differences between the groups in the relative use of these categories. In Part 2 we found that distance from the target person plays a role in cross-cultural differences in trait use and contextualization. In Part 3 we found significant interactions of culture with the use of traits and contextual information across agency-communion and 9 indigenous South African personality clusters similar to the Big Five. The responses of Blacks confirmed expectations for collectivistic groups (fewer traits and more contextualization) and of Whites for individualistic groups (more traits and less contextualization), and Coloureds and Indians had an intermediate pattern. The results are discussed in the framework of the trait and cultural psychology perspectives on personality.
机译:本研究调查了南非的三个民族文化群体在使用特征和上下文信息进行人格描述方面的差异,以及这些差异与目标人群的社会距离以及人格领域之间的相互作用。进行半结构化访谈,要求自我描述和其他描述,他们分别代表了该国11种正式语言的1,027名黑人,84名有色人种和印第安人以及105名白人。在第1部分中,我们发现三个类别中用于描述性格的总类别中的相似点-特质,行为,偏好和知觉(超过86%),也与上下文无关(超过66%)-在这些类别的相对使用上,各组之间存在实质性差异。在第2部分中,我们发现与目标人物的距离在特质使用和情境化的跨文化差异中起作用。在第3部分中,我们发现文化之间的显着相互作用,包括跨机构交流和9个类似于“大五国”的南非土著人格集群的特质和上下文信息的使用。黑人的回应证实了对集体主义群体的期望(较少的特征和更多的情境化),而白人对个人主义的期望群体(更多的特征和较少的情境化)得到了期望,而有色人种和印第安人的回答则是中间模式。在性格特征和文化心理学观点框架内讨论了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号