首页> 外文期刊>Journal of perinatology: Official journal of the California Perinatal Association >A study of the role of multiple site blood cultures in the evaluation of neonatal sepsis.
【24h】

A study of the role of multiple site blood cultures in the evaluation of neonatal sepsis.

机译:多部位血液培养在评估新生儿败血症中的作用的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The optimal number of blood cultures needed to document sepsis in an ill neonate has undergone little critical evaluation. Multiple site cultures may improve pathogen detection if intermittent bacteremia occurs, or if a low density of bacteria is present in the blood. We hypothesized, however, that bacterial clearance is slower and bacteremia more continuous in septic neonates, so that a single site blood culture should be sufficient to accurately document true septicemia.Objective:To determine the need for multiple site blood cultures in the evaluation of neonates for sepsis. DESIGN/METHODS: Clinical data were prospectively collected for 216 neonates who had 269 pairs of blood cultures taken from two different peripheral sites for the evaluation of possible sepsis. A minimum of 1 ml of blood was obtained from the two peripheral sites within 15-30 min of each other. Based on prior retrospective data, we determined that 203 infants would need to have two site blood cultures to demonstrate a significant improvement in pathogen detection at an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.20 (80%) power. RESULTS: A total of 186 culture pairs were taken for evaluation of early-onset sepsis in 186 neonates, while 83 pairs were drawn for evaluation of late-onset sepsis in 43 neonates. In all, 21 neonates from the late-onset group were evaluated more than once, and 12 neonates were evaluated for both early- and late-onset sepsis. In all, 20 (9.2%) of 216 neonates had 22 episodes of culture-proven sepsis at a median age of 18 days. All neonates with positive cultures had the same organism with a similar sensitivity pattern obtained from the two different peripheral sites. The other 196 study neonates had negative blood cultures from both sites. The single episode of early-onset sepsis was caused by Listeria monocytogenes, while all remaining episodes were late-onset with the following organisms: Staphylococcus epidermidis (7), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (3), combined MRSA and Candida albicans (2), Candida albicans alone (2), late-onset Group B beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GBS) (2), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2), Enterococcus fecalis (1), Escherichia coli (1), and Serratia marcescens (1). Since no infant grew organisms from only one of the two sites, the data indicate that the diagnosis of sepsis would have been made correctly in all infants with a single site culture. CONCLUSIONS: Two site blood cultures for the initial evaluation of neonatal sepsis do not have a better yield in pathogen detection. Sepsis in neonates can be detected with no loss of accuracy with a single site blood culture with blood volume of>or=1 ml.
机译:背景:在患病的新生儿中记录败血症所需的最佳血液培养数量几乎没有严格的评估。如果发生间歇性菌血症或血液中细菌浓度低,多部位培养可以改善病原体检测。然而,我们假设败血症新生儿的细菌清除速度较慢,菌血症更连续,因此单部位血液培养应足以准确记录真实的败血症。目的:确定评估新生儿时是否需要多部位血液培养对于败血症。设计/方法:前瞻性收集了216例新生儿的临床数据,他们从两个不同的周围部位采集了269对血液培养物,以评估可能的败血症。彼此在15-30分钟内从两个外围部位至少采集了1 ml血液。根据先前的回顾性数据,我们确定203名婴儿将需要进行两次现场血液培养,以证明病原体检测显着改善,α值为0.05,β值为0.20(80%)。结果:共计186对培养物用于评估186例新生儿的败血症,而绘制83对培养物用于评估43例新生儿的败血症。总共对迟发组的21例新生儿进行了不止一次评估,对早发和迟发性脓毒症均对12例新生儿进行了评估。总共216名新生儿中有20名(9.2%)在中位年龄为18天时有22次经文化证实的败血症。所有培养阳性的新生儿均具有相同的生物体,并且从两个不同的外周部位获得了相似的敏感性模式。其余196名研究新生儿在两个部位血培养均为阴性。早期败血症的单发是由单核细胞增生性李斯特菌引起的,而其余所有发作均是以下生物迟发的:表皮葡萄球菌(7),耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)(3),MRSA和白色念珠菌联合(2),单独的白色念珠菌(2),迟发的B组β-溶血性链球菌(GBS)(2),肺炎克雷伯菌(2),费卡肠球菌(1),大肠杆菌(1)和粘质沙雷氏菌(1) )。由于没有婴儿从两个部位中的任何一个生长出微生物,因此数据表明,在所有具有单一部位培养物的婴儿中,败血症的诊断将是正确的。结论:两个部位的血液培养物用于新生儿败血症的初步评估在病原体检测中没有更好的产率。血容量大于或等于1 ml的单点血液培养可以检测到新生儿败血症,而不会降低准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号