首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric oncology nursing: official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses >A Crossover Randomized Prospective Pilot Study Evaluating a Central Venous Catheter Team in Reducing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Oncology Patients
【24h】

A Crossover Randomized Prospective Pilot Study Evaluating a Central Venous Catheter Team in Reducing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Oncology Patients

机译:一项交叉随机前瞻性研究,评估中央静脉导管在减少儿科肿瘤患者导管相关的血液感染中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Treatment for most children with cancer includes the use of a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs provide reliable venous access for delivery of chemotherapy and supportive care. This advantage is mitigated by an increased risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs). Despite the ubiquitous use of CVCs, few prospective studies have been conducted to address infection prevention strategies in pediatric oncology patients. Design: Prospective, crossover pilot study of a CVC team intervention versus standard care. Setting: Two inpatient oncology units in a metropolitan children's hospital. Patients: A total of 41 patients/135 admissions for the experimental unit (EU) and 41/129 admissions for the control unit (CU). Methods: Patients received a CVC blood draw bundle procedure by a CVC registered nurse (RN) team member (experimental intervention: EU) for 6 months and by the assigned bedside RN (standard care: CU) for 6 months. Feasibility of implementing a CVC RN team; a significant difference in CVC-related BSIs between the team intervention versus standard care and risk factors associated in the development of CVC-related BSIs were determined. Results: There were 7 CVC-related BSIs/1238 catheter days in the EU group (5.7/1000 catheter days) versus 3 CVC-related BSIs/1419 catheter days in the CU group (2.1/1000 catheter days; P =.97). Selected risk factors were not significantly associated with the development of a CVC-related BSI. Conclusions: A CVC team in the care of pediatric oncology patients is feasible; however, a larger cohort will be required to adequately determine the effectiveness of the team reducing CVC-related BSIs.
机译:背景:大多数癌症儿童的治疗包括使用中央静脉导管(CVC)。 CVC为可靠的静脉通路提供化学疗法和支持性护理。血液感染(BSI)风险的增加减轻了这一优势。尽管普遍使用CVC,但很少进行前瞻性研究来解决儿科肿瘤患者的感染预防策略。设计:CVC团队干预与标准护理的前瞻性交叉试验研究。地点:大城市儿童医院的两个住院肿瘤科。患者:实验单元(EU)共有41名患者/ 135例入院,对照组(CU)共有41/129例。方法:患者由CVC注册护士(RN)团队成员(实验干预:EU)接受CVC抽血捆绑程序治疗6个月,并由指定的床旁RN(标准护理:CU)接受6个月。成立CVC RN团队的可行性;团队干预与标准护理之间的CVC相关BSI有显着差异,并且确定了与CVC相关BSI发展相关的风险因素。结果:EU组有7个与CVC相关的BSIs / 1238导管天(5.7 / 1000个导管天),而CU组有3个与CVC相关的BSIs / 1419导管天(2.1 / 1000个导管天; P = .97) 。选择的危险因素与CVC相关的BSI的发展没有显着相关。结论:CVC团队在儿科肿瘤患者的护理中是可行的;但是,将需要更大的队列来充分确定团队减少与CVC相关的BSI的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号