【24h】

Comparison of GC-MS and TLC techniques for asarone isomers determination.

机译:GC-MS和TLC技术用于测定Asarone异构体的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two chromatographic methods (GC-MS and TLC) have been developed for separation and determination of alpha and beta asarone from essential oils and alcoholic extracts. The study has been performed on the Acorus calamus (I) and Asarum europaeum (II) essential oils of Romanian origin and the alcoholic extract of Acorus calcamus L (III) and it is a consequence of the International Boards exigency regarding the presence of beta asarone in food, beverages and pharmaceuticals. The isomers were determined using both internal and external standard methods. Both SIM and SCAN techniques were used and the results were compared regarding the chromatographic resolution and interference compounds. The method exhibits good repeatability and low detection limit but is expensive and time consuming. The two isomers concentrations are 5.2- 6.7 microg ml(-1) (I), 460-510 microg ml(-1) (II) and 2.7 5.7 microg ml (III) for alpha asarone and 91-98 microg ml(-1) (I), 24-29 microg ml(-1) (II) and 88 97 microg ml(-1) (III) for beta asarone. The TLC method was developed as an alternative for the GC method. The separation was performed on silica gel plates using toluene: ethyl acetate 8:2 as mobile phase. The evaluation of the chromatograms was made by densitometry using multiple wavelength. The sum of the two isomers are between 80-120 microg ml(-1) (I) and 127-145 microg ml(-1) (III) using spectrophotometric detection and between 73-93 microg ml(-1) (I) and 99-105 microg ml(-1) (III) using fluorimetric detection. The results of the two chromatographic methods were compared. Even the GC is more sensitive, mathematical computations for spots optimization and interference elimination could improves the TLC quality results.
机译:已经开发出两种色谱法(GC-MS和TLC)从香精油和酒精提取物中分离和测定α和β细辛。这项研究是针对罗马尼亚起源的cal蒲(I)和细辛(Asarum europaeum)(II)精油以及cal蒲Acamus L(III)的酒精提取物进行的,这是国际委员会对β-细辛醚存在的紧急性的结果在食品,饮料和药品中。使用内部和外部标准方法确定异构体。同时使用了SIM和SCAN技术,并对色谱分离度和干扰化合物进行了比较。该方法表现出良好的可重复性和低检测限,但是昂贵且费时。两种异构体的浓度分别为5.2- 6.7微克ml(-1)(I),460-510微克ml(-1)(II)和2.7 5.7微克ml(III)(对于α细辛和91-98微克ml(-1) )(I),β-细辛酮的24-29微克ml(-1)(II)和88 97微克ml(-1)(III)。开发了TLC方法作为GC方法的替代方法。在硅胶板上进行分离,使用甲苯:乙酸乙酯8∶2作为流动相。通过使用多个波长的光密度法进行色谱图的评价。使用分光光度法检测,两种异构体的总和在80-120 microg ml(-1)(I)和127-145 microg ml(-1)(III)之间,在73-93 microg ml(-1)(I)之间和99-105 microg ml(-1)(III)使用荧光检测。比较了两种色谱方法的结果。即使GC更加灵敏,用于斑点优化和消除干扰的数学计算也可以改善TLC的质量结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号