首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic trauma >Nonoperative treatment of the medial malleolus in bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Nonoperative treatment of the medial malleolus in bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures: A randomized controlled trial

机译:非手术治疗踝小梁和三趾踝骨折中的内踝:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES:: To compare internal fixation with no fixation of the medial malleolus after open reduction and internal fixation of the lateral malleolus and if needed, the posterior malleolus. DESIGN:: Randomized prospective trial. SETTING:: Level III trauma center in a metropolitan area. PATIENTS:: One hundred patients with bimalleolar or trimalleolar Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44 ankle fractures and displacement of the medial malleolus less than 2 mm after open reduction and internal fixation of the lateral component. INTERVENTION:: Internal fixation or nonoperative treatment of the medial malleolus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hind foot score (AOFAS), The Olerud Molander Ankle (OMA) score, and visual analogue pain scale (VAS). RESULTS:: Median follow-up time was 39 months (range: 24-72). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to OMA (P = 0.91), AOFAS (P = 0.85), VAS (P = 0.85), or development of osteoarthritis (P = 0.22). Reoperation and complication rates were also comparable, but 4 patients treated nonoperatively developed nonunion of the medial malleolus. These patients reported no functional disabilities and presented OMA, AOFAS, and VAS scores better than average. CONCLUSIONS:: Our data indicate that nonoperative treatment of minimally displaced fractures of the medial malleolus after operative fixation of the fibula yields satisfactory results. However, long-term follow-up is needed due to increased risk of nonunion and uncertainty regarding the development of posttraumatic arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:目的:比较开放复位和外侧踝的内固定以及如果需要时后踝的内固定与不固定内踝之间的比较。设计::随机前瞻性试验。地点:大城市地区的III级创伤中心。患者:100例股骨小梁或三趾骨矫形创伤协会的踝关节骨折,经切开复位术及侧向组件内固定后,内踝移位少于2 mm。干预::对内踝进行内固定或非手术治疗。主要观察指标:美国骨科足踝协会踝后足评分(AOFAS),Olerud Molander踝关节(OMA)评分和视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)。结果:中位随访时间为39个月(范围:24-72)。两组之间的OMA(P = 0.91),AOFAS(P = 0.85),VAS(P = 0.85)或骨关节炎的发生(P = 0.22)没有显着差异。再次手术和并发症发生率也相当,但有4例接受非手术治疗的内踝骨不愈合患者。这些患者没有功能障碍,并且OMA,AOFAS和VAS评分均高于平均水平。结论:我们的数据表明,对腓骨进行手术固定后,对内踝的最小移位骨折进行非手术治疗可获得满意的结果。但是,由于不愈合的风险增加以及创伤后关节炎发展的不确定性,需要进行长期随访。证据级别::治疗级别II。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号