...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic research >A retrospective analysis of two independent prospective cartilage repair studies: autogenous perichondrial grafting versus subchondral drilling 10 years post-surgery.
【24h】

A retrospective analysis of two independent prospective cartilage repair studies: autogenous perichondrial grafting versus subchondral drilling 10 years post-surgery.

机译:两项独立的前瞻性软骨修复研究的回顾性分析:术后10年自体软骨膜移植与软骨下钻探。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Experimental data indicate that perichondrial grafting to restore articular cartilage defects will result in repair with hyaline-like cartilage. In contrast. debridement and drilling results in repair with fibro-cartilage. In this retrospective study the long-term clinical results of both procedures were compared to evaluate the theoretical benefit of repair with hyaline-like tissue. METHODS: From two independent studies patients were selected with a cartilage defect in their knee. The selection was performed using strict inclusion criteria published elsewhere [Bouwmeester et al. Int. Orthop. 21 (1997) 313]. The patients were treated with either a perichondrium transplantation (PT group, n = 14) or with an 'open' debridement and drilling procedure (DD group, n = 11). The results of both procedures after 10-11 years were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSSS), X-ray examination, clinical examination and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain during walking and at rest. RESULTS: Both procedures resulted in a general improvement compared to the situation before the operation. After an average of 10 years in the PT group there were three failures, in the DD group none, success rates were 78% and 100%, respectively. When comparing the successful PT patients with the DD patients, there were no differences in HSSS and VAS data. Both groups showed an equal number of irregular operation surface sites on X-ray (PT 9/11 versus DD 8/10). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that clinically at 10 years follow-up no difference was observed between debridement and drilling and perichondrium transplantation for treatment of an isolated cartilage defect. This raises questions about ongoing research to develop methods in order to improve the results of debridement and drilling as therapy for an isolated cartilage defect in a young patient (< or = 40 years).
机译:背景:实验数据表明,软骨膜移植可修复关节软骨缺损,可修复透明样软骨。相反。清创术和钻探导致纤维软骨修复。在这项回顾性研究中,比较了两种手术的长期临床效果,以评估用透明样组织修复的理论益处。方法:从两个独立的研究中,选择膝关节软骨缺损的患者。使用在其他地方发表的严格纳入标准进行选择[Bouwmeester等。诠释骨科21(1997)313]。对患者进行了软骨膜移植(PT组,n = 14)或“开放式”清创和钻孔手术(DD组,n = 11)。使用医院特殊手术膝关节评分(HSSS),X射线检查,临床检查和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估步行和休息时的疼痛,评估10-11年后这两种手术的结果。结果:与手术前相比,这两种程序均带来了总体改善。 PT组平均失败10年后,发生了3次失败,而DD组中没有失败,成功率分别为78%和100%。比较成功的PT患者和DD患者时,HSSS和VAS数据没有差异。两组在X射线上均显示相同数量的不规则手术表面部位(PT 9/11与DD 8/10)。结论:这项研究表明,在10年的临床随访中,清创术和钻孔术以及软骨膜移植治疗孤立的软骨缺损之间没有发现差异。这提出了有关正在进行的研究以开发方法以改善清创术和钻探作为治疗年轻患者(<或= 40岁)孤立的软骨缺损的方法的疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号