...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurology >Efficacy and safety of 1,000mg effervescent aspirin: individual patient data meta-analysis of three trials in migraine headache and migraine accompanying symptoms.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of 1,000mg effervescent aspirin: individual patient data meta-analysis of three trials in migraine headache and migraine accompanying symptoms.

机译:1000mg泡腾阿司匹林的疗效和安全性:偏头痛和偏头痛伴随症状的三项试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Migraine is often associated with health consequences including impaired quality of life, and the cost of treating migraine headaches places a significant financial burden on patients who suffer from migraines. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans are commonly used for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Aspirin is widely accepted as a treatment option for migraine pain relief and could provide an alternative not only for treatment of moderate migraine attacks, but also for severe migraine attacks. The efficacy and safety of 1,000 mg effervescent aspirin (eASA) was evaluated in comparison to 50 mg sumatriptan and placebo in an individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized, placebo-controlled, single- dose migraine trials. Pain-relief at 2 h, pain-free at 2 h and sustained pain-free up to 24 h were calculated. For eASA, the response rates were 51.5 % (95 % CI: 46.6-56.5 %), 27.1 % (95 % CI: 22.6-31.4 %), and 23.5 % (95 % CI: 19.3-27.7 %). For sumatriptan, the response rates were 46.6 % (95% CI: 40.0-53.2 %), 29% (95 % CI: 23.0-34.9 %), and 22.2 % (95 % CI: 16.7-27.6 %). The corresponding rates for placebo were 33.9 % (95% CI: 29.1-38.6 %), 15.1 % (95 % CI: 11.5-18.7 %), and 14.6 % (95 % CI: 11.0-18.1 %). The treatment effect of eASA and sumatriptan were significantly different from placebo (p < 0.001), but differences between eASA and sumatriptan were not significant. The remission of accompanying symptoms and the subgroup analyses of patients with moderate or severe migraine pain at baseline revealed no significant differences between eASA and sumatriptan. Safety was evaluated based on the frequency of reported adverse events, and treatment with eASA was associated with lower incidence of adverse events than was with sumatriptan. This individual patient data meta-analysis provided evidence that eASA 1,000mg is as effective as sumatriptan 50mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks and has a better side effect profile. This is also true for patients with moderate as well as severe headache at baseline. Patients therefore should be advised to use eASA first for migraine attacks and use a triptan in case of no response.
机译:偏头痛通常与健康后果相关,包括生活质量受损,而且治疗偏头痛的费用给患有偏头痛的患者带来巨大的经济负担。非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)和曲坦类常被用于治疗急性偏头痛发作。阿司匹林被广泛认为是缓解偏头痛的一种治疗选择,不仅可以为中度偏头痛发作提供治疗方法,而且可以为严重的偏头痛发作提供治疗方法。在三项随机,安慰剂对照,单剂量偏头痛试验的患者数据荟萃分析中,与50 mg舒马曲坦和安慰剂相比,评估了1000 mg泡腾阿司匹林(eASA)的疗效和安全性。计算了2小时的疼痛缓解,2小时的无疼痛感以及长达24小时的持续无痛感。对于eASA,响应率是51.5%(95%CI:46.6-56.5%),27.1%(95%CI:22.6-31.4%)和23.5%(95%CI:19.3-27.7%)。舒马普坦的缓解率为46.6%(95%CI:40.0-53.2%),29%(95%CI:23.0-34.9%)和22.2%(95%CI:16.7-27.6%)。安慰剂的相应比例为33.9%(95%CI:29.1-38.6%),15.1%(95%CI:11.5-18.7%)和14.6%(95%CI:11.0-18.1%)。 eASA和舒马曲坦的治疗效果与安慰剂有显着差异(p <0.001),但eASA和舒马曲坦之间的差异不显着。基线时中度或重度偏头痛患者的伴随症状缓解和亚组分析显示,eASA和舒马曲坦之间无显着差异。根据报告的不良事件发生频率评估安全性,eASA治疗的不良事件发生率低于舒马普坦。这项单独的患者数据荟萃分析提供了证据,即eASA 1,000mg与舒马普坦50mg一样有效,可以治疗急性偏头痛,并且副作用更佳。对于基线时中度和重度头痛的患者也是如此。因此,应建议患者首先使用eASA进行偏头痛发作,并在无反应的情况下使用曲普坦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号