首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Management of a broken needle: retained in the first caesarean section, removed during the second abdominal delivery.
【24h】

Management of a broken needle: retained in the first caesarean section, removed during the second abdominal delivery.

机译:断针的处理:保留在剖腹产的第一部分,在第二次剖腹产时取出。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction:Breakage of a needle during medical interventions is unusual. When fracture occurs it is usually due to inappropriate needle selection) excessive resistance offered by the tissue as well as poor operator technique. Although patients live normally with a variety of foreign bodies in their tissues, there are good reasons to remove broken needles. First, the needle could migrate to a position in which adjacent structures might be compromised or surgical removal may be more difficult after migration (Reinmuth et al. 1995; Silvestro et al. 2001). Additionally, late complications of retained broken needles include infection and nerve irritation (Chintamani et al. 2003).
机译:简介:在医疗干预期间断针是不寻常的。当发生骨折时,通常是由于针头选择不当所致)组织提供的过大阻力以及不良的操作员技术。尽管患者的组织中通常生活着各种各样的异物,但是有充分的理由去除断针。首先,针可能会迁移到可能损害邻近结构的位置,或者在迁移后可能很难进行手术切除(Reinmuth等,1995; Silvestro等,2001)。此外,保留断针的晚期并发症包括感染和神经刺激(Chintamani等,2003)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号