首页> 外文期刊>Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition >Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two simvastatin 40 mg tablets (Simvast & Zocor) in healthy human volunteers.
【24h】

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two simvastatin 40 mg tablets (Simvast & Zocor) in healthy human volunteers.

机译:两种辛伐他汀40毫克片剂(Simvast&Zocor)在健康人类志愿者中的药代动力学和生物等效性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pharmacokinetics of two brands of simvastatin 40 mg tablets were compared in 24 healthy human volunteers after a single oral dose in a randomized cross-over study, conducted at IPRC, Amman, Jordan. Reference (Zocor, MSD, Netherlands) and test (Simvast, Julphar, UAE) products were administered to fasted volunteers; blood samples were collected at specified time intervals, plasma separated and analyzed for simvastatin and its active metabolite (beta-hydoxy acid) using a validated LC-MS/MS method at Cartesius Analytical Unit, Institute of Biomedical Sciences - USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0- proportional, variant ), C(MAX), T(MAX), T(1/2) and elimination rate constant were determined from plasma concentration-time profile for both formulations and were compared statistically to evaluate bioequivalence between the two brands, using the statistical modules recommended by FDA. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not show any significant difference between the two formulations and 90% confidence intervals fell within the acceptable range for bioequivalence. Based on these statistical inferences it was concluded that the two brands exhibited comparable pharmacokinetic profiles and that Julphar's Simvast is bioequivalent to Zocor of MSD, Netherlands.
机译:在IPRC(约旦安曼)进行的随机交叉研究中,单次口服剂量后,在24位健康人类志愿者中比较了两种品牌的辛伐他汀40 mg片剂的药代动力学。禁食志愿者服用了参比产品(Zocor,MSD,荷兰)和测试产品(Simvast,Julphar,阿联酋)。在指定的时间间隔收集血液样本,分离血浆并使用经过验证的LC-MS / MS方法在美国圣保罗州生物医学研究所生物医学科学研究所的Cartesius分析室使用辛伐他汀及其活性代谢物(β-羟酸)进行分析。从血浆浓度-时间曲线确定两种制剂的药代动力学参数AUC(0-t),AUC(0-比例,变体),C(MAX),T(MAX),T(1/2)和消除速率常数并使用FDA推荐的统计模块进行统计学比较,以评估两个品牌之间的生物等效性。方差分析(ANOVA)没有显示两种配方之间的任何显着差异,并且90%的置信区间落在生物等效性的可接受范围内。根据这些统计推断,可以得出结论,这两个品牌均显示出可比较的药代动力学特征,而朱帕尔的Simvast与荷兰MSD的Zocor具有生物等效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号