...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Variability of intraoperative electrocortical stimulation mapping parameters across and within individuals.
【24h】

Variability of intraoperative electrocortical stimulation mapping parameters across and within individuals.

机译:个体内和个体内术中皮层刺激测绘参数的变异性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECT: Electrocortical stimulation mapping is regarded as the gold standard of intraoperative mapping for predicting functional outcomes. Nevertheless, methodologies across institutions are inconsistent. Although many vary and maximize stimulation currents at each cortical site, some use a single current level to map the entire exposed cortex. The former comes at the cost of possibly inducing additional afterdischarge activity. The authors retrospectively reviewed their eperience with intraoperative electrocortical stimulation mapping to characterize variability of both mapping and afterdischarge thresholds. METHODS: Seventeen patients satisfied the study inclusion criteria. Significant variability in mapping thresholds was identified within individuals and across the patient population. Moreover, a statistically significant difference in mapping thresholds was demonstrated between the frontal and parietal/temporal lobes (p = 0.007, one-way analysis of variance). The authors report a surprisingly highincidence of afterdischarge during mapping, wide variability in afterdischarge thresholds within individuals and across the study population, and mapping thresholds regularly exceeding afterdischarge thresholds in neighboring cortex. Differences in afterdischarge thresholds across lobes only approached significance (p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: To maximize identification of eloquent cortices in some clinical situations, it may be advantageous to maximize currents at each cortical site regardless of adjacent afterdischarge threshold rather than to map the entire exposed cortex at a single current level. Moreover, the current findings highlight the need for electrocorticography during electrocortical stimulation mapping, both to identify when afterdischarges occur and to verify stimulation by recording stimu lation artifacts. The advantages and limitations of maximizing currents at each cortical site as well as mapping at a single current level are discussed.
机译:目的:皮层电刺激测绘被认为是术中测绘预测功能结果的金标准。然而,跨机构的方法并不一致。尽管许多变化并最大化了每个皮质部位的刺激电流,但有些人使用单个电流水平来绘制整个裸露皮层。前者的代价是可能引起额外的放电后活动。作者回顾性地回顾了他们的术中电皮层刺激测绘的经验,以表征测绘和放电后阈值的变化。方法:17例患者符合研究纳入标准。在个体内以及整个患者群体中鉴定出了图谱阈值的显着变化。此外,额叶和顶叶/颞叶之间的映射阈值在统计学上有显着差异(p = 0.007,单向方差分析)。作者报告说,制图过程中的放电后发生率高得令人惊讶,个体内和整个研究人群的放电后阈值变化很大,并且制图阈值经常超过邻近皮质的放电后阈值。跨瓣后放电阈值的差异仅达到显着性(p = 0.086)。结论:在某些临床情况下,要最大限度地识别雄辩的皮质,不考虑相邻的放电后阈值而使每个皮质部位的电流最大化,而不是将整个暴露的皮质映射到单个电流水平可能是有利的。此外,当前的发现突出显示了在皮质电刺激图绘制过程中需要进行皮质电图检查,既可以确定何时发生后放电,又可以通过记录刺激伪影来验证刺激。讨论了最大化每个皮质部位的电流以及在单个电流水平进行映射的优点和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号