...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery.
【24h】

Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery.

机译:颈内动脉破裂的血泡样动脉瘤破裂的重建性血管内治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECT: Ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) are rare but carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, BBAs are very difficult to treat surgically as well as endovascularly. The authors present their experience in treating BBAs with reconstructive endovascular methods. METHODS: Nine ruptured BBAs in 9 consecutive patients (2 men and 7 women; mean age 50 years, range 42-57 years) were treated using reconstructive endovascular methods between January 2006 and November 2007. Treatment methods and angiographic and clinical outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: All 9 BBAs were initially treated with stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization. This was followed by a second stent insertion using the stent-within-a-stent (SWS) technique in 3, covered stent placement in 3, and SAC embolization alone in 3. All 3 patients who underwent SWS placement had excellent outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale Score 5) with complete angiographic resolution of theBBAs. There were no treatment-related complications in the SWS group. Two of the 3 patients who received covered stents had excellent outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale Score 5) and complete occlusion of the BBA was achieved. The remaining patient who received a covered stent died of ICA rupture during the procedure. Aneurysm regrowth without rebleeding occurred in the 3 patients who underwent SAC embolization. Two of the 3 recurrent BBAs were treated with coil embolization with a second stent insertion, and as a result these belonged to the SWS group. The other recurrent BBA was treated with a covered stent. Of the 8 surviving patients, 5 underwent SWS, and 3 underwent covered stent placement. All surviving patients had excellent outcomes during the clinical follow-up period (mean 11 months, range 4-26 months); complete BBA resolution and smooth reconstruction of the affected ICA segment was shown on follow-up angiography. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the SWS and covered-stent techniques effectively prevented rebleeding and regrowth of the BBA without sacrifice of the ICA. The SWS and covered-stent techniques can be considered an alternative treatment option for BBAs in selected patients in whom ICA sacrifice is not feasible. Stent-assisted coiling alone seems insufficient to prevent BBA regrowth.
机译:目的:颈内动脉(ICA)破裂的血泡样动脉瘤(BBA)破裂,但发病率和死亡率很高。此外,BBA很难通过外科手术以及血管内治疗。作者介绍了他们使用重建性血管内方法治疗BBA的经验。方法:自2006年1月至2007年11月,采用重建性血管内方法治疗了9例连续9例BBA破裂(2例男性和7例女性,平均年龄50岁,范围42-57岁)。回顾性评估了治疗方法以及血管造影和临床结果。结果:所有9个BBA最初都接受了支架辅助线圈(SAC)栓塞治疗。随后,使用支架内支架(SWS)技术进行第二次支架置入术(3),覆盖支架置入术(3)和单独SAC栓塞术(3)。所有接受SWS置入术的3例患者均具有良好的预后(Glasgow结果规模得分5),BBA的血管造影完全。 SWS组中没有与治疗相关的并发症。在接受覆膜支架的3例患者中,有2例具有良好的预后(格拉斯哥预后评分得分5),并且BBA完全闭塞。其余接受覆膜支架的患者在手术过程中死于ICA破裂。 3例行SAC栓塞术的患者发生了无再出血的动脉瘤。对3个复发性BBA中的2个进行了线圈栓塞治疗,并插入了第二个支架,因此它们属于SWS组。另一个复发性BBA用覆膜支架治疗。存活的8例患者中,有5例接受了SWS,有3例接受了覆膜支架置入。在临床随访期间(平均11个月,范围4-26个月),所有幸存的患者均具有出色的预后。随访血管造影显示完全的BBA分辨率和受影响的ICA节段的平滑重建。结论:在本研究中,SWS和覆膜支架技术有效地防止了BBA的再出血和再生长,而无需牺牲ICA。 SWS和覆膜支架技术可以被认为是某些选择的ICA牺牲不可行的患者的BBA的替代治疗选择。单独使用支架辅助卷绕似乎不足以防止BBA再生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号