...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS neuroscience & therapeutics >Why has the antidepressant-placebo difference in antidepressant clinical trials diminished over the past three decades?
【24h】

Why has the antidepressant-placebo difference in antidepressant clinical trials diminished over the past three decades?

机译:为什么在过去的三十年中,抗抑郁药与安慰剂之间的差异在抗抑郁药临床试验中有所减少?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The increasing rate of failure of antidepressant clinical trials has led to the assertion that antidepressants do not have meaningful clinical benefits. Our hypothesis was that the decrease in antidepressant-placebo differences in antidepressant clinical trials over the past three decades could be explained by changes in research design features rather than a lack of potency of the antidepressants being tested. We collected data from 130 double blind placebo controlled antidepressant clinical trials conducted between 1981 and 2008 that included 35,122 depressed patients with 23,157 patients assigned to antidepressants and 11,965 assigned to placebo. We conducted a hierarchical regression analysis of change in HAM-D scores in antidepressant and placebo groups separately with year of publication, and research design features as independent variables. We found that antidepressant-placebo differences in antidepressant clinical trials have declined markedly over the past three decades. Decline in change scores in the antidepressant group was related to mean total baseline HAM-D scores in the trial, the version of HAM-D used, and duration of trial. Similarly, decline in change scores in the placebo group was related to mean total baseline HAM-D scores, duration of trial, and year of publication. Overall, we found that antidepressant-placebo differences were statistically significantly higher in trials that used HAM-D 21 rather than HAM-D 17 and in trials that lasted 6 weeks or less. These data suggest that, apart from the efficacy of the antidepressant being tested, factors such as baseline HAM-D scores, version of HAM-D used and duration of trial have a significant impact on outcome. As such a clinician's assessment of the usefulness of antidepressants should not be based solely on the results of such clinical trials. In the meantime there is a need for continuing research to improve the methodology of antidepressant clinical trials. These data suggest that many aspects of the design of antidepressant trials have a significant impact on outcome. Further, these data suggest that the results of more recent placebo controlled trials do not adequately inform clinicians about the potential utility of antidepressants.
机译:抗抑郁药临床试验失败率的上升导致人们断言抗抑郁药没有有意义的临床益处。我们的假设是,过去三十年来抗抑郁药与安慰剂之间差异的减少,可以通过研究设计特征的改变而不是所测试的抗抑郁药缺乏效力来解释。我们收集了1981年至2008年间进行的130项双盲安慰剂对照抗抑郁药临床试验的数据,其中包括35,122例抑郁症患者,其中23,157例为抗抑郁药,11,965例为安慰剂。我们对抗抑郁药组和安慰剂组的HAM-D评分随出版年份的变化分别进行了层次回归分析,并将研究设计特征作为独立变量。我们发现在过去的三十年中,抗抑郁药与安慰剂之间的差异在抗抑郁药临床试验中已显着下降。抗抑郁药组变化评分的下降与试验中平均总基线HAM-D得分,使用的HAM-D版本以及试验持续时间有关。同样,安慰剂组的变化评分下降与平均总HAM-D基线评分,试验持续时间和出版年份有关。总体而言,我们发现在使用HAM-D 21而不是HAM-D 17的试验中以及持续6周或更短的试验中,抗抑郁药-安慰剂的差异在统计学上显着更高。这些数据表明,除了所测试的抗抑郁药的功效外,诸如基线HAM-D评分,所用HAM-D的版本和试验持续时间等因素均对结果产生重大影响。因此,临床医生对抗抑郁药有效性的评估不应仅基于此类临床试验的结果。同时,需要继续进行研究以改善抗抑郁药临床试验的方法。这些数据表明抗抑郁试验设计的许多方面都对结果产生重大影响。此外,这些数据表明,较新的安慰剂对照试验结果未能充分告知临床医生抗抑郁药的潜在用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号