首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education >Community in Three Undergraduate University Science Courses: An Analysis of Student Perception
【24h】

Community in Three Undergraduate University Science Courses: An Analysis of Student Perception

机译:大学科学三门课程的社区:学生知觉分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CC S consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (n = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (n = 74, M = 55.24), t (255) = 3.55, p < 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, t (255) = 2.81, p < 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, t (255) = 1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, t (186) = 2.95, p < 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.
机译:与没有社区水平的学生相比,觉得自己是课堂社区的一部分的学生会获得更多的乐趣,并且在学业上也更成功。这项研究旨在确定在线课程的学生是否与面对面课堂的学生对社区的了解程度相同,以及外界因素是否会影响社区的看法。课堂社区调查(CCS)是针对三个入门级科学课的学生而进行的,每个科学课都有一个面对面的部分和一个在线的部分。 CC S包含20个问题,用于衡量整体社区和两个分量表(连接性和学习性)。五个可能的答案的总分为1到5,满分为100。人口统计学问题被问及是否超出类别的因素会影响社区得分。面对面部分的学生(n = 183,M = 58.10)的社区得分明显高于在线学生(n = 74,M = 55.24),t(255)= 3.55,p <0.05。面对面学习的学生的连通性得分显着高于其在线对等学生的得分,t(255)= 2.81,p <0.05。根据课程交付方法,学习子量表的得分没有显着差异,t(255)= 1.80,ns。在八个人口统计学问题中,只有有关是否需要课程的问题对社区分数有重大影响,t(186)= 2.95,p <0.05。这项研究的结果表明,面对面的学生比在线学生感知到的社区水平明显更高。不同授课方式的学生对学习和课程成绩的看法没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号