...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of memory and language >Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing
【24h】

Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing

机译:句子理解过程中的直接访问检索:来自欺诈的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Language comprehension requires recovering meaning from linguistic form, even when the mapping between the two is indirect. A canonical example is ellipsis, the omission of information that is subsequently understood without being overtly pronounced. Comprehension of ellipsis requires retrieval of an antecedent from memory, without prior prediction, a property which enables the study of retrieval in situ (Martin & McElree, 2008, 2009). Sluicing, or inflectional-phrase ellipsis, in the presence of a conjunction, presents a test case where a competing antecedent position is syntactically licensed, in contrast with most cases of nonadjacent dependency, including verb-phrase ellipsis. We present speed-accuracy tradeoff and eye-movement data inconsistent with the hypothesis that retrieval is accomplished via a syntactically guided search, a particular variant of search not examined in past research. The observed timecourse profiles are consistent with the hypothesis that antecedents are retrieved via a cue-dependent direct-access mechanism susceptible to general memory variables.
机译:语言理解要求从语言形式中恢复意义,即使两者之间的映射是间接的。一个典型的例子是省略号,省略了信息,这些信息随后被理解而没有明显地被宣读。省略号的理解需要从内存中检索先行词,而无需事先预测,这是一种能够就地进行检索研究的属性(Martin&McElree,2008,2009)。与大多数不相邻的依存关系(包括动词短语省略号)相比,在存在连词的情况下,用词“ sluicing”或“屈曲短语”省略号是一个测试案例,其中竞争性先行词句在句法上得到许可。我们提出的速度精度折衷和眼动数据与假设是通过句法指导的搜索来完成检索这一假设相矛盾的,这是过去研究中未研究过的一种特殊搜索形式。观察到的时程分布与以下假设一致:通过易受一般记忆变量影响的依赖于线索的直接访问机制检索先行词。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号