...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries >Analysis of underlying causes of investigated loss of containment incidents in Dutch Seveso plants using the Storybuilder method
【24h】

Analysis of underlying causes of investigated loss of containment incidents in Dutch Seveso plants using the Storybuilder method

机译:使用Storybuilder方法分析荷兰Seveso工厂中被调查的密闭事件损失的根本原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the Netherlands there are around 400 "Seveso" sites that fall under the Dutch Major Hazards Decree (BRZO) 1999. Between 2006 and 2010 the Dutch Labour Inspectorate's Directorate for Major Hazard Control completed investigations of 118 loss of containment incidents involving hazardous substances from this group. On the basis of investigation reports the incidents were entered in a tailor-made tool called Storybuilder developed for the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment for identifying the dominant patterns of technical safety barrier failures, barrier task failures and underlying management causes associated with the resulting loss of control events. The model is a bow-tie structure with six lines of defence, three on either side of the central loss of containment event. In the first line of defence, failures in the safety barriers leading to loss of control events were primarily equipment condition failures, pre start-up and safeguarding failures and process deviations such as pressure and flow failures. These deviations, which should have been recovered while still within the safe envelope of operation, were missed primarily because of inadequate indication signals that the deviations have occurred. Through failures of subsequent lines of defence they are developing into serious incidents. Overall, task failures are principally failures to provide adequate technical safety barriers and failures to operate provided barriers appropriately. Underlying management delivery failures were mainly found in equipment specifications and provisions, procedures and competence. The competence delivery system is especially important for identifying equipment condition, equipment isolation for maintenance, pre-start-up status and process deviations. Human errors associated with operating barriers were identified in fifty per cent of cases, were mostly mistakes and feature primarily in failure to prevent deviations and subsequently recover them. Loss of control associated with loss of containment was primarily due to the containment being bypassed (72% of incidents) and less to material strength failures (28%). Transfer pipework, connections in process plant and relief valves are the most frequent release points and the dominant release material is extremely flammable. It is concluded that the analysis of a large number of incidents in Storybuilder can support the quantification of underlying causes and provide evidence of where the weak points exist in major hazard control in the prevention of major accidents.
机译:在荷兰,大约有400个“ Seveso”场所属于1999年《荷兰重大危害法令》(BRZO)的管辖范围。2006年至2010年间,荷兰劳动监察局重大危害控制局完成了118起涉及该有害物质的收容事故的调查。组。根据调查报告,事件被输入到一个名为Storybuilder的量身定制的工具中,该工具是为荷兰社会事务和就业部开发的,用于识别技术安全障碍失败,障碍任务失败以及与之相关的潜在管理原因的主要模式失去控制事件。该模型为领结结构,有六道防线,在中央围堵事件的两侧各有三道。在第一道防线中,导致控制事件损失的安全屏障故障主要是设备状况故障,预启动和维护故障以及过程偏差(例如压力和流量故障)。这些偏差本应在仍处于安全运行范围之内时予以恢复的,但主要是由于指示偏差的发生信号不足而错过了。由于后来的防线失灵,它们正演变成严重的事件。总体而言,任务失败主要是指无法提供足够的技术安全屏障的操作,以及指无法适当操作提供的屏障的操作。潜在的管理交付失败主要在设备规格,规定,程序和能力中发现。能力交付系统对于识别设备状况,设备隔离维护,启动前状态和过程偏差尤其重要。在50%的案例中发现了与操作障碍相关的人为错误,其中大多数是错误,其主要特征是无法防止偏差并随后将其恢复。与密闭性丧失相关的失控主要是由于绕开了密闭性(占事故的72%),而材料强度失效较少(28%)。输送管道,加工厂的接口和溢流阀是最常见的释放点,主要的释放材料极易燃。结论是,对Storybuilder中大量事件的分析可以支持对根本原因的量化,并提供证据说明预防重大事故时主要危害控制中的薄弱环节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号