首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interprofessional care >The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): an alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability.
【24h】

The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): an alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability.

机译:跨学科教育知觉量表(IEPS):另一种改建的子量表结构及其可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The original 4 sub-scale version of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) was published by Luecht et al. (1990, Journal of Allied Health, 181 - 191). There appears however to be a lack of evidence of the stability of the original instrument and of the test-retest reliability of the items and sub-scales when used with undergraduates. Given that during its development only 143 subjects completed the questionnaire which contained 18 items the generalizability of the instrument should perhaps have been investigated further. The Interprofessional Learning Group (IPL) at Glasgow Caledonian University has been using both the IEPS and the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) (Parsell & Bligh, 1999, Medical Education, 33, 95 - 100) to monitor changes in attitudes and perceptions of undergraduate students from eight different health and social care programmes. This paper reports the development of an alternative sub-scale model for the IEPS based on a sample of 308 students. Various aspects of the reliability of this revised model based on a subsequent data set of 247 students are also reported. This revised model appears to be stable for use with undergraduate students yielding Cronbach Alpha values for two of the sub-scales greater than 0.80 and test-retest weighted kappa values for items being fair to moderate.
机译:跨学科教育知觉量表(IEPS)的原始4个子量表版本由Luecht等人出版。 (1990,《联合健康杂志》,181-191)。然而,似乎缺乏证据证明原始仪器的稳定性以及与大学生一起使用时项目和子量表的重测可靠性。鉴于在开发过程中只有143名受试者完成了包含18个项目的问卷,因此应该进一步研究该工具的可推广性。格拉斯哥喀里多尼亚大学的专业间学习小组(IPL)一直在使用IEPS和专业间学习准备量表(RIPLS)(Parsell&Bligh,1999,Medical Education,33,95-100)来监测态度和观念的变化来自八个不同健康和社会护理计划的本科生。本文以308名学生为样本,报告了IEPS替代子量表模型的开发情况。还报告了基于247名学生的后续数据集,该修订模型的可靠性的各个方面。对于大学生而言,对于两个子量表,其Cronbach Alpha值均大于0.80,并且对于重至中等的项目,通过重测加权kappa值得出的结果看来,此修订模型似乎是稳定的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号